Table 4 |
||
|
Comparison of true and apparent prevalence's of pig sera between indirect assays |
||
|
test |
True prevalence |
Apparent prevalence |
|
|
||
|
BBA-TOX |
56.6% |
50.1% |
|
|
|
|
|
E1-TOX |
38.3% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
E2-TOX |
45.9% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
E3-TOX |
48.0% |
|
|
|
||
|
BBA-TRI |
58.6% |
39.8% |
|
|
|
|
|
E-TRI |
44.2% |
|
|
|
||
|
BBA-TOX, T. gondii antigen coupled bead-based assay; E1-TOX, RIVM in-house T. gondii ELISA; E2-TOX, Safepath T. gondii ELISA; E3-TOX, ID-VET T. gondii ELISA; BBA-TRI, T. spiralis antigen coupled bead-based assay and E-TRI, Safepath T. spiralis ELISA |
||
|
Bokken et al. BMC Veterinary Research 2012 8:36 doi:10.1186/1746-6148-8-36 |
||
