|Summary of ward data recorded in the study and of municipal data from the 2002 national census|
|GL||KH||IL||MK||All study area||Iringa|
|Nr of HH||1630||3013||1171||2179||7993||24512|
|Nr of humans||9975||12833||3868||7486||34162||106668|
|Nr of dogs||1011||959||167||361||2498||na|
|DHH in % (mean, 95% CIs)||22.45 (20.43-24.42)||15.15 13.87-16.45||7.51 6.06-9.05||7.02 5.97-8.12||13.29 12.56-14.06||na|
|Dogs/HH (mean, 95% CIs)||0.62 (0.54-0.70)||0.30 0.27-0.34||0.14 0.11-0.18||0.16 0.12-0.19||0.31 0.28-0.33||na|
|Dog:Human (mean, 95% CIs)||1:10 (1:11-1:9)||1:14 1:16-1:13||1:23 1:31-1:18||1:21 1:26-1:18||1:14 1:15-1:13||na|
number of households; number of inhabitants as per 2002 national census; number of dogs recorded during the study; number of dog-owning households (DHH) in mean and 95% CI; number of dogs per household counted in mean and 95%CI; dog:human ratio in mean and 95%CI; and dog densities in number of dogs recorded per km-2 for each ward as well as for the study area and the municipality.
Gsell et al.
Gsell et al. BMC Veterinary Research 2012 8:236 doi:10.1186/1746-6148-8-236