Email updates

Keep up to date with the latest news and content from BMC Veterinary Research and BioMed Central.

Open Access Highly Accessed Research article

Biofilm forming abilities of Salmonella are correlated with persistence in fish meal- and feed factories

Lene K Vestby1, Trond Møretrø2, Solveig Langsrud2, Even Heir2 and Live L Nesse1*

Author Affiliations

1 National Veterinary Institute, PO Box 750 Sentrum, N-0106, Oslo, Norway

2 Nofima mat, Osloveien 1, N-1430, Aas, Norway

For all author emails, please log on.

BMC Veterinary Research 2009, 5:20  doi:10.1186/1746-6148-5-20

The electronic version of this article is the complete one and can be found online at: http://www.biomedcentral.com/1746-6148/5/20


Received:19 February 2009
Accepted:27 May 2009
Published:27 May 2009

© 2009 Vestby et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Background

Feed contaminated with Salmonella spp. constitutes a risk of Salmonella infections in animals, and subsequently in the consumers of animal products. Salmonella are occasionally isolated from the feed factory environment and some clones of Salmonella persist in the factory environment for several years. One hypothesis is that biofilm formation facilitates persistence by protecting bacteria against environmental stress, e.g. disinfection. The aim of this study was to investigate the biofilm forming potential of Salmonella strains from feed- and fishmeal factories. The study included 111 Salmonella strains isolated from Norwegian feed and fish meal factories in the period 1991–2006 of serovar Agona, serovar Montevideo, serovar Senftenberg and serovar Typhimurium.

Results

Significant differences were found between serovars regarding the abilities to form biofilm on polystyrene (microtiter plate assay) and in the air-liquid interface of nutrient broth (pellicle assay). Strains of serovar Agona and serovar Montevideo were good biofilm producers. In Norwegian factories, clones of these serovars have been observed to persist for several years. Most serovar Senftenberg clones appear to persist for a shorter period, and strains of this serovar were medium biofilm producers in our test systems. Strains of the serovar Typhimurium were relatively poor biofilm producers. Salmonella ser. Typhimurium clones have not been observed to persist even though this serovar is resident in Norwegian wild life. When classifying strains according to persistence or presumed non-persistence, persistent strains produced more biofilm than presumed non-persisting strains.

Conclusion

The results indicate a correlation between persistence and biofilm formation which suggests that biofilm forming ability may be an important factor for persistence of Salmonella in the factory environment.

Background

Salmonella spp. are important enteropathogenic pathogens, which may cause disease in humans, animals and birds. The bacteria are mainly transmitted via the faecal-oral route, and salmonellosis is one of the most common and widely distributed foodborne diseases in humans. According to the WHO, millions of human cases are reported worldwide every year, and the disease results in thousands of deaths http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs139/en/ webcite. The occurrence of Salmonella in feed and feed ingredients is a well-recognized problem worldwide [1-5]. This constitutes a considerable risk of Salmonella infection in animals, and subsequently in the consumers of animal products [6]. Therefore, large resources are put into the fight against Salmonella in feed- and fishmeal factories. Still, some clones seem to be able to persist in the factory environment for several years [7]. Earlier studies have showed that these clones are not particularly resistant to disinfection or air-drying at surfaces [8]. Because biofilm protects bacteria against environmental stress, e.g. disinfection [9], one hypothesis is that biofilm formation facilitates persistence. This has been shown for Listeria monocytogenes [10], but to the best of our knowledge, a similar linkage between biofilm formation and persistence in the environment has not been shown for Salmonella.

Bacterial biofilms are defined as microbial sessile communities that are attached to a substance, to an interface or to each other [11]. In the biofilm, the cells are embedded in a self produced matrix which may act as chemical and mechanical protection against the surroundings [12,13]. Bacteria in biofilms are known to be more resistant to disinfectants and drying [14-16]. Recent studies have shown that Salmonella are capable of forming biofilm on different contact surfaces like glass, polymer, steel [17-20] along with organic surfaces like parsley [21]. Salmonella ser. Typhimurium has also been shown to form biofilm (pellicle) on the liquid-air interface of nutrient broth [15,22]. Many disinfectants which are commonly used in feed production environment were shown to have low bactericidal activity against strains from Norwegian feed- and fishmeal factories in biofilm [14].

The aim of the present study was to investigate whether the biofilm forming abilities of Salmonella strains at room temperature may contribute to persistence in the factory environment. The serovar Agona, serovar Montevideo and serovar Senftenberg have for many years been the ones most frequently isolated from Norwegian factories, but are rarely found in humans and animals [7,23]. On the other hand, Salmonella ser. Typhimurium, which is endemic in Norwegian wildlife [24], is seldom found in the factories. Therefore, the biofilm producing abilities of these serovars were compared.

Methods

Bacterial strains and culture conditions

A total of 116 S. enterica strains of serovar Agona (n = 39), serovar Montevideo (n = 30), serovar Senftenberg (n = 34) and serovar Typhimurium (n = 13) were used in this study, including 111 strains from Norwegian feed and fish meal factories, isolated in the years 1991–2006 [7,23], as well as the National reference strains of serovar Agona (FHBA266), serovar Montevideo (FHBA46), serovar Senftenberg (FHBA87) and serovar Typhimurium strains ATCC 14028 and ATCC 2700720D (LT2). The factories that submitted Salmonella to this study all have internal Salmonella control, based on the HACCP system. Samples were taken once or twice a month throughout the production period, from products as well as from critical control points in the environment such as filters, drains, product contact surfaces and other surfaces. Some factories also collected samples from raw materials. Environmental samples were collected as dust, incrustations and swabs. All isolations were carried out at different private or official laboratories and verified at the National Reference Laboratory for Salmonella in Feed and Food at the National Veterinary Institute.

Forty-four of the strains were characterised by pulsed field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) as described earlier [7,23]. If strains with the same PFGE profile had been isolated from the same factory over a time period of at least one year, the strain that was last isolated was classified as persistent. A strain was classified as presumed non-persistent if no other strain with the same PFGE-profile had been isolated from the same factory. Based on these criteria, the study included seven persistent strains (four serovar Agona, three serovar Montevideo) and 14 presumed non-persistent strains (two serovar Agona, three serovar Montevideo, three serovar Senftenberg, six serovar Typhimurium). All of these strains originated from environmental or product samples, and not from raw materials.

Nine strains from the collection were used to test the effect of prolonged incubation in microtiter plates; the serovar Typhimurium ATCC strains 14028 and LT2 (700720D), the national reference strains of serovar Agona, serovar Montevideo and serovar Senftenberg and one randomly selected factory strain of each of the same serovars. All the factory strains (n = 111) were included in the screening on liquid, whereas the screening in microtiter plates included 61 factory strains (19 serovar Agona strains, 12 serovar Montevideo strains, 21 serovar Senftenberg strains and nine serovar Typhimurium strains). The selection criteria for screening in microtiter plates were to represent a diversity of PFGE profiles, to include isolates from as many feed and fish meal factories and years as possible in the study material.

All strains were stored at -80°C in Brain Heart Infusion broth (BHI; Difco, BD, NJ, USA) supplemented with 15% glycerine (Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany) and recovered on bloodagar (sheepblood) at 37.0 ± 1.0°C overnight. The bacterial cultures were then transferred into Luria Bertani broth (LB; Merck KGaA) and incubated statically overnight at 37.0 ± 1.0°C. Luria Bertani without NaCl (LB wo/NaCl; bacto-tryptone 10 g/L, yeast extract 5 g/L) was used as test broth in the biofilm assays [25].

Biofilm on polystyrene

The assay was based on the method described by Woodward and associates [20]. In short; overnight cultures were diluted in LB wo/NaCl to OD595 = 0.2, and 30 μL of this suspension were transferred to each well in 96 wells polystyrene microtiter plates (Nunc, Nuncleon, Roskilde, Denmark) containing 100 μL LB wo/NaCl (three parallels of each strain), and the microtiter plates were incubated statically for two days, at 20.0 ± 1.0°C. When testing the effect of prolonged incubation, the plates were incubated statically at 20.0 ± 1.0°C for one, two, three and four days. After incubation, OD595 were measured before the plates were gently washed once with sterile distilled water (SDW). The plates were dried in room temperature before addition of 130 μL 1% crystal violet. After 30 minutes incubation in room temperature, the plates were washed three times with SDW before addition of 130 μL ethanol:acetone (70:30 w:w) and incubation for 10 minutes in room temperature. OD595 were measured after the bound dye was dissolved using ethanol:acetone. For each strain, the result was calculated by subtracting the median OD595 of the three parallels of the control (test broth only) from the median OD595 of the three parallels of sample.

Biofilm in liquid- air interface

To study biofilm formation in liquid, i.e. pellicle formation at the liquid-air interface, 4.5 mL LB wo/NaCl was inoculated with 0.5 mL of an overnight culture, and incubated statically at 20.0 ± 1.0°C for eight days. The strains were visually examined every day and categorized according to pellicle formation or not [26].

Statistics

Statistical analyses were performed using the software JMP (SAS Institute Inc.version 5.0.1a, Cary, NC, USA) and Minitab (release 14.2, Minitab Inc., PA. USA). Log10-transformed values were used when necessary.

Results

Biofilm on polystyrene

In the screening of 61 factory strains in microtiter plates, OD595 values were found to range from 0 to 1.46. Statistically significant differences between serovars were observed (One-way ANOVA, p < 0.01) (Figure 1). Highest OD595 values were observed in serovar Agona and serovar Montevideo strains (mean 0.89 and 0.82, respectively), medium OD595 values in the serovar Senftenberg strains (mean 0.51), and lowest OD595 values in serovar Typhimurium strains (mean 0.21). The persistent strains had higher OD595 (mean 1.01) than the presumed non-persistent strains (mean 0.44) (Students' t test, p < 0.05). As persistent strains were only found within serovar Agona and serovar Montevideo, a comparison was also performed using the persistent and presumed non-persistent strains of these serovars only. Also in this comparison, the persistent strains displayed a higher OD595 than the presumed non-persistent strains (mean OD595 1.01 vs 0.69, Students' t test, p = 0.05). By incubating the subset of nine strains for a prolonged time (two, three and four days), increased OD595 values after three and four days were only observed for the serovar Senftenberg strains.

thumbnailFigure 1. Biofilm formation in microtiterplates. Mean amount of biofilm formation of different Salmonella serovars in microtiter plates at 20°C represented by OD595. Bars represent standard error of the mean. Levels not connected by the same letter are significantly different (p < 0.05).

Pellicle formation in liquid

All strains were tested for their ability to form biofilm in standing liquid, i.e. formation of a pellicle at the liquid-air interface. Pellicle formation was found to vary between serovars (Chi square p < 0.01) (Figure 2). High frequencies of pellicle formation were found among serovar Agona, serovar Montevideo and serovar Senftenberg strains (100, 100 and 88%, respectively), while only 55% of the serovar Typhimurium strains formed a pellicle. Pellicle producers had a higher mean OD595 in microtiter plates (mean 0.68, STD = 0.42) than strains without pellicle (mean = 0.40, STD = 0.50) (Students' t test, p < 0.05). The rate of pellicle formation also varied between the serovars tested (Students' t test, p < 0.05) (Figure 2). Strains of serovar Agona and serovar Montevideo were rapid pellicle producers, whereas serovar Senftenberg and serovar Typhimurium were slow pellicle producers. The number of days needed to form a pellicle was negatively correlated to OD595 observed in microtiter plates (linear fit, p < 0.01), i.e. the higher the OD595, the shorter time was needed to form a pellicle. The mean number of days needed to form a pellicle was lower in the persistent strains than in the presumed non-persistent strains, both when including all the defined strains (2.4 vs 3.5, Students' t test, p < 0.05), and when testing the serovar Agona and serovar Montevideo strains only (2.4 vs 3.6, Students' t test, p < 0.05).

thumbnailFigure 2. Pellicle formation in liquid-air interface. Percentage of strains within each serovar with a pellicle in standing liquid at different incubation times.

Discussion

Several clones of serovar Agona and serovar Montevideo have persisted in some Norwegian feed- and fishmeal factories over a number of years [7,23]. In our study, these serovars were in general the good biofilm producers in microtiter plates. Furthermore, most strains of these serovars rapidly formed a biofilm (pellicle) at the air-liquid interface. Salmonella ser. Senftenberg has also been repeatedly isolated from feed- and fishmeal factories, but pulsed-field gel electrophoresis studies have shown that these strains display a relative large number of different profiles [23]. This may indicate that many serovar Senftenberg clones enter the factories and may persist for a while, but probably not as long as serovar Agona and serovar Montevideo. However, serovar Senftenberg is the serovar most commonly isolated from imported feed raw materials http://www.vetinst.no/eng/Forskning/Rapporter/Zoonoserapporten webcite[1] and this may contribute the high prevalence in the factory samples. The serovar Senftenberg strains studied were medium biofilm producers in the microtiter plate assay. Although most of the serovar Senftenberg strains did form a pellicle, the rate was slow. The serovar Typhimurium is known to be endemic in Norwegian wild life [24] and is probably present in the surrounding environment of most factories. Still, this serovar is rarely isolated from factories, and has not been observed to persist. The serovar Typhimurium strains tested produced little biofilm in microtiter plates. As many as 45% of the strains did not produce a pellicle, and the remaining strains were slow pellicle producers. In summary, the strongly persistent serovar Agona and serovar Montevideo were good biofilm producers, the medium persistent serovar Senftenberg was a medium biofilm producer and the non-persistent serovar Typhimurium displayed the weakest biofilm forming abilities in our test systems. These observations support the hypothesis that the biofilm forming ability is an important factor for persistence of Salmonella strains in the factory environment.

This hypothesis is further supported by the results showing that the persistent strains clearly were better biofilm producers in both test systems than the presumed non-persistent strains. To exclude the possibility that serovar may be a confounding variable, we also compared biofilm production by persistent and presumed non-persistent strains of serovar Agona and serovar Montevideo only. Also in this comparison, the persistent strains were better biofilm producers than the presumed non-persistent strains, indicating that the observed correlation between persistence and biofilm production is not due to a confounding effect of serovar. In our study, the factories had for over a number of years sent us Salmonella isolates that they have found through their internal control routines. This provided a good knowledge of the Salmonella situation in the different factories over time. In addition, we chose relatively strict criteria for classifying strains as persistent and non-persistent, compared to similar studies performed with Listeria monocytogenes [27,28]. The classification of strains is therefore believed to be as reliable as possible.

Consequently, all our results favour the hypothesis that biofilm forming abilities at room temperature are linked to persistence of Salmonella in fish meal and feed production environments. To our knowledge, such a linkage has not been reported previously for Salmonella. However, similar results has been reported for Listeria monocytogenes [10], where differences in biofilm formation was detected between persistent and non-persistent strains of from bulk milk samples [27], and from poultry plants and an ice cream plant [28]. Even though biofilm formation has been shown to be important for persistence, it is clearly not the only contributing factor. Being a good biofilm producer gives an advantage, but opportunities for biofilm formation must also be present, e.g. failure in HACCP control routines that enables Salmonella to establish in the environment and form biofilm. Other characteristics of the bacteria may also contribute to persistence.

All assays in the present study were performed at 20°C. According to representatives from the feed- and fishmeal factories involved in this study, the temperatures in different parts of the factories may vary from 5 to 40°C, although around 20°C is most common. In this study, biofilm formation on polystyrene and on the air-liquid interphase was assessed. This may not be the most common surfaces in the factory environment. However, in studies with a limited number of strains we found a correlation between biofilm formation of Salmonella on polystyrene and stainless steel at room temperature (results not shown). Thus the biofilm characteristics determined in this study should be of relevance regarding the biofilm forming potential of the Salmonella strains in the feed factory environment.

Several factors may contribute to the amount of biofilm observed in the microtiter plate assay at a given length of incubation, e.g. ability to adhere to the surface, the rate of biofilm formation, detachment of parts of the biofilm. In the present study, a correlation between the results from the two assays was observed, indicating that the OD595 in microtiter plates after two days was influenced by the production rate. However, when testing a subset of stains in the microtiter plate assay over prolonged incubation periods, only the serovar Senftenberg strains displayed a significant increase in OD595 values from day two to day four. Consequently, the production rate was probably the major limiting factor for the serovar Senftenberg strains in the microtiter plate assay when the incubation time was only two days. This was supported by the results from the pellicle assay, where the majority of the serovar Senftenberg strains did produce a pellicle given enough time. On the other hand, prolonged incubation did not substantially increase the OD595 in the microtiter plate assay or the number of pellicles produced by the serovar Typhimurium strains. Therefore, other factors than rate are probably more limiting within this serovar.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the present study showed significant differences between serovars regarding biofilm formation on polystyrene and the liquid-air interface. The results indicate that the ability to form biofilm is important for the bacteria's persistence in feed factory environments.

Authors' contributions

LKV was responsible for the study design, performing all the screening experiments, analysis of the data, and preparation of the manuscript, and LLN participated in all these parts. TM and SL were responsible for establishing the microtiterplate method. All authors contributed to the study design and revision of the draft manuscript. All authors have read, edited and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgements

The project was funded by the Norwegian Research Council, Felleskjøpet Fôrutvikling BA, Norwegian Seafood Federation Fish- meal and -feed, Norgesfôr and NHO – Federation of Norwegian Meat Industry.

Sigrun E. Storheim is gratefully acknowledged for her technical assistance and Dr. Rolf Bjerke Larssen for his statistical advice.

References

  1. Anon: Scientific Opinion of the Panel on Biological Hazards on a request from the Health and Consumer Protection, Directory General, European Commission on Microbiological Risk Assessment in feedingstuffs for foodproducing animals.

    EFSA J 2008, 720:1-84. OpenURL

  2. Davies RH, Wray C: Distribution of Salmonella contamination in ten animal feedmills.

    Vet Microbiol 1997, 57:159-169. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  3. Lunestad BT, Nesse L, Lassen J, Svihus B, Nesbakken T, Fossum K, et al.: Salmonella in fish feed; occurrence and implications for fish and human health in Norway.

    Aquaculture 2007, 265:1-8. Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  4. Shirota K, Katoh H, Murase T, Ito T, Otsuki K: Monitoring of layer feed and eggs for Salmonella in eastern Japan between 1993 and 1998.

    J Food Prot 2001, 64:734-737. PubMed Abstract OpenURL

  5. Veldman A, Vahl HA, Borggreve GJ, Fuller DC: A survey of the incidence of Salmonella species and Enterobacteriaceae in poultry feeds and feed components.

    Vet Rec 1995, 136:169-172. PubMed Abstract OpenURL

  6. Crump JA, Griffin PM, Angulo FJ: Bacterial contamination of animal feed and its relationship to human foodborne illness.

    Clin Infect Dis 2002, 35:859-865. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  7. Nesse LL, Nordby K, Heir E, Bergsjoe B, Vardund T, Nygaard H, et al.: Molecular analyses of Salmonella enterica isolates from fish feed factories and fish feed ingredients.

    Appl Environ Microbiol 2003, 69:1075-1081. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | PubMed Central Full Text OpenURL

  8. Møretrø T, Midtgaard ES, Nesse LL, Langsrud S: Susceptibility of Salmonella isolated from fish feed factories to disinfectants and air-drying at surfaces.

    Vet Microbiol 2003, 94:207-217. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  9. Ronner AB, Wong ACL: Biofilm development and sanitizer inactivation of Listeria monocytogenes and Salmonella Typhimurium on stainless-steel and Buna-N Rubber.

    J Food Prot 1993, 56:750-758. OpenURL

  10. Møretrø T, Langsrud S: Listeria monocytogenes : biofilm formation and persistence in food-processing environments.

    Biofilms 2004, 1:107-121. Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  11. Costerton JW, Lewandowski Z, Caldwell DE, Korber DR, Lappinscott HM: Microbial biofilms.

    Annu Rev Microbiol 1995, 49:711-745. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  12. Matthysse AG, Holmes KV, Gurlitz RH: Elaboration of cellulose fibrils by Agrobacterium tumefaciens during attachment to carrot cells.

    J Bacteriol 1981, 145:583-595. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | PubMed Central Full Text OpenURL

  13. Zogaj X, Nimtz M, Rohde M, Bokranz W, Romling U: The multicellular morphotypes of Salmonella Typhimurium and Escherichia coli produce cellulose as the second component of the extracellular matrix.

    Mol Microbiol 2001, 39:1452-1463. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  14. Møretrø T, Vestby LK, Nesse LL, Hannevik S, Kotlarz K, Langsrud S: Evaluation of efficiency of disinfectants against Salmonella from the feed industry.

    J Appl Microbiol 2009, 106:1005-1012. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  15. Scher K, Romling U, Yaron S: Effect of heat, acidification, and chlorination on Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium cells in a biofilm formed at the air-liquid interface.

    Appl Environ Microbiol 2005, 71:1163-1168. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | PubMed Central Full Text OpenURL

  16. White AP, Gibson DL, Kim W, Kay WW, Surette MG: Thin aggregative fimbriae and cellulose enhance long-term survival and persistence of Salmonella.

    J Bacteriol 2006, 188:3219-3227. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | PubMed Central Full Text OpenURL

  17. Hood SK, Zottola EA: Adherence to stainless steel by foodborne microorganisms during growth in model food systems.

    Int J Food Microbiol 1997, 37:145-153. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  18. Joseph B, Otta SK, Karunasagar I, Karunasagar I: Biofilm formation by Salmonella spp. on food contact surfaces and their sensitivity to sanitizers.

    Int J Food Microbiol 2001, 64:367-372. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  19. Solano C, Sesma B, Alvarez M, Humphrey TJ, Thorns CJ, Gamazo C: Discrimination of strains of Salmonella Enteritidis with differing levels of virulence by an in vitro glass adherence test.

    J Clin Microbiol 1998, 36:674-678. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | PubMed Central Full Text OpenURL

  20. Woodward MJ, Sojka M, Sprigings KA, Humphrey TJ: The role of sef 14 and sef17 fimbriae in the adherence of Salmonella enterica serotype Enteritidis to inanimate surfaces.

    J Med Microbiol 2000, 49:481-487. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  21. Lapidot A, Romling U, Yaron S: Biofilm formation and the survival of Salmonella Typhimurium on parsley.

    Int J Food Microbiol 2006, 109:229-233. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  22. Romling U, Rohde M: Flagella modulate the multicellular behavior of Salmonella Typhimurium on the community level.

    FEMS Microbiol Lett 1999, 180:91-102. PubMed Abstract OpenURL

  23. Nesse LL, Refsum T, Heir E, Nordby K, Vardund T, Holstad G: Molecular epidemiology of Salmonella spp. isolates from gulls, fish-meal factories, feed factories, animals and humans in Norway based on pulsed-field gel electrophoresis.

    Epidemiol Infect 2005, 133:53-58. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  24. Refsum T, Handeland K, Baggesen DL, Holstad G, Kapperud G: Salmonellae in avian wildlife in Norway from 1969 to 2000.

    Appl Environ Microbiol 2002, 68:5595-5599. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | PubMed Central Full Text OpenURL

  25. Romling U, Sierralta WD, Eriksson K, Normark S: Multicellular and aggregative behaviour of Salmonella Typhimurium strains is controlled by mutations in the agfD promoter.

    Mol Microbiol 1998, 28:249-264. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  26. Solano C, Garcia B, Valle J, Berasain C, Ghigo JM, Gamazo C, et al.: Genetic analysis of Salmonella Enteritidis biofilm formation: critical role of cellulose.

    Mol Microbiol 2002, 43:793-808. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  27. Borucki MK, Peppin JD, White D, Loge F, Call DR: Variation in biofilm formation among strains of Listeria monocytogenes.

    Appl Environ Microbiol 2003, 69:7336-7342. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | PubMed Central Full Text OpenURL

  28. Lunden JM, Miettinen MK, Autio TJ, Korkeala HJ: Persistent Listeria monocytogenes strains show enhanced adherence to food contact surface after short contact times.

    J Food Prot 2000, 63:1204-1207. PubMed Abstract OpenURL