Open Access Open Badges Research article

Patient-centred tuberculosis treatment delivery under programmatic conditions in Tanzania: a cohort study

Saidi Egwaga1, Abdallah Mkopi2, Nyagosya Range3, Vera Haag-Arbenz4, Amuri Baraka2, Penny Grewal4, Frank Cobelens56, Hassan Mshinda2, Fred Lwilla1 and Frank van Leth56*

Author Affiliations

1 National Tuberculosis and Leprosy Programme, Ministry of Health and Social Welfare, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania

2 Ifakara Health Institute, Ifakara, Tanzania

3 National Institute for Medical Research, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania

4 Novartis Foundation for Sustainable Development, Basle, Switzerland

5 KNCV Tuberculosis Foundation, The Hague, The Netherlands

6 Center for Infection and Immunity, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

For all author emails, please log on.

BMC Medicine 2009, 7:80  doi:10.1186/1741-7015-7-80

Published: 21 December 2009



Directly observed therapy (DOT) remains the cornerstone of the global tuberculosis (TB) control strategy. Tanzania, one of the 22 high-burden countries regarding TB, changed the first-line treatment regimen to contain rifampicin-containing fixed-dose combination for the full 6 months of treatment. As daily health facility-based DOT for this long period is not feasible for the patient, nor for the health system, Tanzania introduced patient centred treatment (PCT). PCT allows patients to choose for daily DOT at a health facility or at their home by a supporter of choice. The introduction of fixed dose combinations in the intensive and continuation phase made PCT feasible by eliminating the risk of selective drug taking by patients and reducing the number of tablets to be taken. The approach was tested in three districts with the objective to assess the effect of this strategy on TB treatment outcomes


Cohort analysis comparing patients treated under the PCT strategy (registered April-September 2006) with patients treated under health-facility-based DOT (registered April-September 2005). The primary outcome was the cure rate. Differences were assessed by calculating the risk ratios. Associations between characteristics of the supporters and treatment outcomes in the group of patients opting for home-based DOT were assessed through logistic regression.


In the PCT cohort there were 1208 patients and 1417 were included in the historic cohort. There was no significant difference in cure rates between the cohorts (risk ratio [RR]: 1.06; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.96-1.16). In the PCT cohort, significantly more patients had successful treatment (cure or treatment completed; RR: 1.10; 95%CI: 1.01-1.15). There were no characteristics of supporters that were associated with treatment outcome.


The PCT approach showed similar cure rates and better treatment success rates compared to daily health-facility DOT. The results indicate that there are no specific prerequisites for the supporter chosen by the patient. The programmatic setting of the study lends strong support for scaling-up of TB treatment observation outside the health facility.