Table 19 |
||||||||
|
Bladder cancer; individual effect (relative risk/odds ratio) estimates |
||||||||
|
ST use |
RR/OR |
|||||||
|
|
|
|||||||
|
Sourcea |
Typeb |
Exposurec |
Smoking |
Sex |
Id. |
Casesd |
Estimate (95%CI) |
Adjustment factorse |
|
|
||||||||
|
Cohort studies |
||||||||
|
Norway cohorts: Boffetta et al. 2005 [26] |
Snuff |
Current |
Any |
M |
1 |
40 |
0.72 (0.52–1.06) |
age, smok |
|
Former |
2 |
30 |
0.98 (0.66–1.47) |
|||||
|
Ever |
3 |
69 |
0.83 (0.62–1.11) |
|||||
|
Case-control studies |
||||||||
|
Lockwood 1961 [43] |
ST |
Current |
Never |
M |
4 |
2 |
0.35 (0.07–1.77)f |
none |
|
Wynder et al. 1963 [46] |
Chew |
Ever |
Any |
M |
5 |
33 |
1.42 (0.82–2.47)f |
none |
|
Snuff |
6 |
6 |
0.66 (0.23–1.88)f |
|||||
|
ST |
7 |
39 |
1.21 (0.74–1.98)g |
|||||
|
Dunham et al. 1968 [48] |
ST |
Ever |
Never |
M |
8 |
4 |
2.57 (0.52–12.54)f |
race |
|
F |
9 |
3 |
0.58 (0.14–2.45)f |
|||||
|
Cole et al. 1971 [51] |
Chew |
Ever |
Any |
M |
10 |
46 |
no associationh |
age |
|
Snuff |
11 |
3 |
no associationi |
|||||
|
Williams and Horm 1977 [55] |
ST |
Ever |
Any |
M |
12 |
29 |
1.67 (1.09–2.55)f |
age, race, smok |
|
F |
13 |
1 |
0.82 (0.11–6.02)f |
none |
||||
|
Wynder and Stellman 1977 [56] |
Chew |
Ever |
Any |
M |
14 |
47 |
0.87 (0.63–1.21)f |
none |
|
Snuff |
15 |
11 |
0.69 (0.36–1.31)f |
|||||
|
ST |
16 |
58 |
0.82 (0.61–1.10)g |
|||||
|
Howe et al. 1980 [58] |
Chew |
Ever |
Any |
M |
17 |
NA |
0.90 (0.50–1.60) |
age, smok |
|
Mommsen and Aagaard 1983 [62] |
Chew |
Ever |
Any |
M |
18 |
39 |
1.70 (1.00–2.90) |
age, res |
|
Hartge et al. 1985 [66] |
Chew |
Ever |
Neverj |
M |
19 |
40 |
1.02 (0.67–1.54) |
age, race, res, smokj |
|
Snuff |
20 |
11 |
0.77 (0.38–1.56) |
|||||
|
ST |
21 |
51 |
1.14 (0.80–1.61)g |
none |
||||
|
Kabat et al. 1986 [69] |
Snuff |
Ever |
Never |
F |
22 |
3 |
10.40 (1.07–101.46) |
none |
|
Slattery et al. 1988 [77] |
Chew |
Ever |
Any |
M |
23 |
20 |
0.76 (0.42–1.39) |
smokk |
|
Never |
24 |
1 |
0.36 (0.05–2.82)l |
none |
||||
|
Snuff |
Ever |
Any |
25 |
16 |
0.92 (0.47–1.82) |
smokk |
||
|
Never |
26 |
2 |
2.74 (0.45–16.69)m |
none |
||||
|
ST |
Ever |
Any |
27 |
36 |
0.82 (0.52–1.29)g |
smokk |
||
|
Never |
28 |
3 |
0.86 (0.24–3.07)g |
none |
||||
|
Burch et al. 1989 [79] |
Chew |
Ever |
Any |
M |
29 |
26 |
0.60 (0.34–1.06) |
age, res, smok |
|
Snuff |
30 |
9 |
0.47 (0.21–1.07) |
|||||
|
ST |
31 |
35 |
0.54 (0.34–0.87)g |
|||||
|
|
||||||||
|
a Fuller details of the studies are given in Tables 1 and 2. b ST implies smokeless tobacco unspecified, or combined snuff use or chewing. c Ever, former and current ST use were compared with never ST. Use indicates timing not given and comparison is with non use. d 'Id.' is the RR/OR identification number used in Table 20, and 'Cases' is the number of cases in ST users as defined. NA = not available. e Abbreviations used: res = area of residence, smok = smoking. f RR/OR and/or 95% CI estimated from data provided in the source. g RR/OR and/or 95% CI estimated from data provided in the source assuming that no one both chewed and used snuff. h Age-adjusted expected number of cases who chewed tobacco was given as 42.3 versus 46 observed. i Age-adjusted expected number of cases who used snuff was given as 2.9 versus 3 observed. j Estimates were for never cigarette smokers adjusted for other tobacco use. k Adjusted for age started to smoke; results adjusted for smoking group, pack years or years stopped are similar. l The source paper gave 2.78 (0.38–20.20) which is incorrect based on the numbers in the 2 × 2 table. m The source paper gave 2.73 (0.48–15.57) which is incorrect based on the numbers in the 2 × 2 table. CI = confidence interval; ST = smokeless tobacco; OR = odds ratio; RR = relative risk. |
||||||||
|
Lee and Hamling BMC Medicine 2009 7:36 doi:10.1186/1741-7015-7-36 |
||||||||