BMC Medicine

official impact factor 5.75

Open Access Highly Access Research article

Calculating the return on investment of mobile healthcare

Nancy E Oriol*, Paul J Cote, Anthony P Vavasis, Jennifer Bennet, Darien DeLorenzo, Philip Blanc and Isaac Kohane

BMC Medicine 2009, 7:27 doi:10.1186/1741-7015-7-27

Misquoted adherence estimate

Nancy Oriol   (2011-06-08 17:14)  Harvard Medical School, The Family Van email

On page 8, the authors incorrectly state that: "NCPP estimations assume a 30% non-compliance with treatment". In fact, as stated in their methods (Priorities among effective clinical preventive services: results of a systematic review and analysis. Am J Prev Med 2006, 31(1):52-61) , NCPP specifically addresses patient adherence in its calculation of effectiveness of each intervention as follows: "Effectiveness = (percent who would accept the preventive service once offered) X (sensitivity of screening or assessment) X (adherence with follow-up treatment or advice to change behavior) X (effectiveness of prevention, treatment, or behavior change)". For example, in calculating the effectiveness of brief counseling services such as smoking cessation, NCPP projected patient adherence to be less than 1%

Competing interests

none

top

Post a comment