Email updates

Keep up to date with the latest news and content from BMC Medicine and BioMed Central.

Journal App

google play app store
Open Access Highly Accessed Research article

Sudden Infant Death Syndrome and prenatal maternal smoking: rising attributed risk in the Back to Sleep era

Mark E Anderson1*, Daniel C Johnson2 and Holly A Batal3

Author Affiliations

1 Department of Community Health Services, Division of Pediatrics, Denver Health and Hospitals Authority, Denver, Colorado, USA

2 Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, Denver, Colorado, USA

3 Department of Community Health Services, Division of General Internal Medicine, Denver Health and Hospitals Authority, Denver, Colorado, USA

For all author emails, please log on.

BMC Medicine 2005, 3:4  doi:10.1186/1741-7015-3-4

The electronic version of this article is the complete one and can be found online at: http://www.biomedcentral.com/1741-7015/3/4


Received:26 May 2004
Accepted:11 January 2005
Published:11 January 2005

© 2005 Anderson et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Background

Parental smoking and prone sleep positioning are recognized causal features of Sudden Infant Death. This study quantifies the relationship between prenatal smoking and infant death over the time period of the Back to Sleep campaign in the United States, which encouraged parents to use a supine sleeping position for infants.

Methods

This retrospective cohort study utilized the Colorado Birth Registry. All singleton, normal birth weight infants born from 1989 to 1998 were identified and linked to the Colorado Infant Death registry. Multivariable logistic regression was used to analyze the relationship between outcomes of interest and prenatal maternal cigarette use. Potential confounders analyzed included infant gender, gestational age, and birth year as well as maternal marital status, ethnicity, pregnancy interval, age, education, and alcohol use.

Results

We analyzed 488,918 birth records after excluding 5835 records with missing smoking status. Smokers were more likely to be single, non-Hispanic, less educated, and to report alcohol use while pregnant (p < 0.001). The study included 598 SIDS cases of which 172 occurred in smoke-exposed infants. Smoke exposed infants were 1.9 times (95% CI 1.6 to 2.3) more likely to die of SIDS. The attributed risk associating smoking and SIDS increased during the study period from approximately 50% to 80%. During the entire study period 59% (101/172) of SIDS deaths in smoke-exposed infants were attributed to maternal smoking.

Conclusions

Due to a decreased overall rate of SIDS likely due to changing infant sleep position, the attributed risk associating maternal smoking and SIDS has increased following the Back to Sleep campaign. Mothers should be informed of the 2-fold increased rate of SIDS associated with maternal cigarette consumption.

Keywords:
Sudden Infant Death Syndrome; SIDS; smoking; infant death; attributed risk

Background

Previous literature has shown a relationship between maternal smoking and the Sudden Infant Death Syndrome (SIDS). Published studies vary in size and methodology but consistently demonstrate a two-fold increased odds of SIDS with both prenatal and postnatal maternal smoking [1-10], including one study of over 300,000 infants in an analysis of birth registry data from the late 1970s [4,6]. A recent secular change, namely the Back to Sleep campaign, has had a major role in reducing SIDS rates. This public health campaign encourages parents to place infants in a supine rather than prone sleeping position. Early studies investigating the effects of supine sleeping revealed significantly reduced SIDS rates [11], but smoking among mothers, which was not targeted as the primary intervention, remained unchanged.

The aim of this study was to confirm the relationship between reported prenatal maternal smoking and SIDS and to examine the effect of sleeping position changes on the attributed risk of SIDS and smoking. The analysis spans the rollout of the Back to Sleep campaign in the United States for the ten-year period from 1989 to 1998. We hypothesized that maternal prenatal smoking confers a clinically significant risk of SIDS and that an increased attributed risk of SIDS associated with smoking could be identified in the wake of the supine sleeping campaign.

Methods

Study setting/population

Since 1969, the State of Colorado has collected data on multiple items through a birth registry. This registry includes extensive demographic data such as maternal report of the number of cigarettes smoked per day during pregnancy. We used the Colorado Infant Death Registry over a 10-year period (1989–1998) to identify causes of infant death.

Study design

We conducted a retrospective cohort study utilizing Cochran Mantel-Haenszel univariate analysis of risk factors and multiple logistic regression on the outcomes of infant death, SIDS, and respiratory deaths. We excluded non-singleton births (14978 records), infants born at less than 2500 grams (36779 records), and birth records where a mother's smoking status was unknown (5835 records). Additional records with missing data were coded so as to place the record in the presumed lower risk group: 42 records with unclear marital status were coded as "married," 67 records missing a maternal age were coded as age "18–34 years," 865 records with unclear gestational age were coded as "term" infants, and 4 records missing a gender assignment were coded as "female" in the analysis. Missing data for education (9659 records) and ethnicity (582 records) were coded as such and included in the analysis directly. We linked the birth and death registries using a unique birth number present in both registries. Utilizing multiple logistic regression, we modeled the exposure of interest, maternal smoking, as both a dichotomous and a continuous variable. Other variables analyzed included infant gender and gestational age (less than 37 weeks, 37 weeks or older), as well as maternal marital status, ethnicity, time between pregnancies (less than 12 months or 12 months and greater), maternal age (<18 years, 18 to 34 years, and >34 years), education, and self-reported use of alcohol in pregnancy. In the analyses for SIDS and respiratory causes of death, deaths from other causes were excluded from the analysis.

Power to detect a 20% difference in a baseline disease occurrence of 3 per 1000 was calculated at 99% for a population of 500,000. SAS version 8.0 (SAS Institute) on a PC was utilized for statistical analyses. We included the interaction between ethnicity and cigarette use in the modeling and requested the Hosmer-Lemeshow statistic from the model.

Study outcomes

We compared cases of SIDS (ICD 9 codes 798.0 to 798.9) between cohorts of infants born to mothers who reported prenatal smoking versus mothers who reported no prenatal smoking. Secondary outcomes included total infant mortality and respiratory deaths (ICD 9 codes 033.0 to 033.9 and 460 to 490). We used unadjusted annual rates to calculate the attributable risk of SIDS associated with maternal cigarette consumption.

Results

Over the 10-year study period, 1573 infants died, 598 SIDS cases occurred (1.2/1000 live born infants), and 34 infants died due to a respiratory etiology. Table 1 describes characteristics of the exposed and unexposed infant cohorts. Smoking mothers were statistically more likely to be single, non-Hispanic, less educated, and to report alcohol use in pregnancy.

Table 1. Demographic characteristics of 488,918 births according to maternal smoking habits during pregnancy, Colorado Birth Registry, 1989 to 1998.

We calculated adjusted odds ratios by analyzing smoking as a dichotomous exposure (mother smoked or did not smoke) and as a continuous variable (number of reported cigarettes per day during the pregnancy). Dichotomous outcomes of reported smoking during pregnancy yielded adjusted odds ratios of 1.9 (95% CI: 1.6 to 2.3) for death due to SIDS, 1.5 (95% CI: 1.3 to 1.7) for infant deaths from all causes, and 3.0 (95% CI: 1.4 to 6.3) for deaths due to respiratory etiologies (p < 0.01 for all outcomes). Table 2 shows results for the model for each of the outcomes. The final logistic regression model for each outcome was slightly different, but smoking remained in each as a significant factor. The interaction between ethnicity and cigarette use did not contribute significantly to the final model and thus was excluded.

Table 2. Adjusted odds ratios for SIDS, all infant deaths, and respiratory deaths with dichotomous cigarette use and other potential confounders*

Analyzing cigarette consumption as a continuous variable shows the associated odds per cigarette are 1.042 (95% CI: 1.030 to 1.054; p < 0.0001). In this model, consumption of 10 cigarettes per day is associated with a 51% increased odds of SIDS (95% risk limit 35% to 70%). The Hosmer-Lemeshow test statistic was non-significant (p > 0.1948) suggesting adequate model fit.

Table 3 shows crude rates of SIDS in the exposed and unexposed cohorts of infants for the years 1989 to 1998. Included is a calculated percent attributed risk (PAR) which, when multiplied by the number of SIDS deaths in the exposed cohort, yields the number of SIDS infants whose death is associated with maternal smoking 12. In this analysis, 101 infant deaths due to SIDS bear an association with maternal smoking among the exposed cohort of 172 infants. Figure 1 demonstrates the increasing PAR associating maternal prenatal smoking and SIDS during the study period, suggesting a stronger link between SIDS and maternal smoking. The average rate for each 2-year period is plotted in the Figure as well. Time was a highly significant variable in the study and SIDS rates decreased markedly over the study time period. The remaining SIDS deaths show a greater relative association with maternal smoking in the years following the Back to Sleep campaign. In the final year of the analysis, 80% of the SIDS deaths in the smoke-exposed infant cohort are attributed to maternal smoking.

Table 3. SIDS in smoke exposed and unexposed infants including attributed risk and deaths among smoke exposed infants by birth year, State of Colorado 1989–1998.

thumbnailFigure 1. Percent attributed risk (PAR) between maternal prenatal smoking and sudden infant death, Colorado Birth Registry 1989–1998.

Discussion

Smoking is deleterious and has negative effects on children born to mothers who smoke [12-16]. We confirm a two-fold increased risk of SIDS in infants born to smoking mothers. In addition, as one cause of SIDS (prone sleeping) was reduced through the Back to Sleep public health campaign in the United States, we noted an increasing attributed risk of SIDS with smoking. As a major etiology of SIDS, prone sleeping position, decreased over the study period due to the national educational campaign, the remaining SIDS deaths may now be due to the more isolated effects of tobacco exposure. Due to a decreased overall rate of SIDS, almost 80% of SIDS among smoke-exposed infants now bear a relationship to cigarette smoking.

Taylor and Sanderson, using data prior to the Back to Sleep campaign in the United States, suggest that up to 30% of SIDS deaths may be attributed to maternal smoking [17]. We note an increasing percent attributed risk in our cohort of 489,000 infants after the roll out of the campaign. Using the attributed risk to calculate an absolute mortality among the exposed cohort, 101 of 172 infant SIDS cases over the 10-year study period are linked to maternal smoking, which is greater than half of the infant deaths due to SIDS in the smoke-exposed cohort.

Our study cannot establish a causal role for maternal smoking in SIDS. Others have argued for a causal relationship based on prospective data, demonstrable dose-response relationships, and analysis using multiple potential confounders [18]. The causal path appears more likely on the basis of multiple studies that support such a link, consistent findings of a dose-response relationship in the literature, and a potential biological basis for the association between the exposure and the outcome [19]. In this study, removing one causative factor for SIDS, prone sleeping, may have increased the relative effect of another factor, maternal smoking, as an agent associated with SIDS.

The published literature reports a 20% to 30% smoking rate among pregnant women [20,21]. Approximately 20% of pregnant smokers will deny smoking, but when tested with urine cotinine will be positive [22]. A recent report suggests that 21% of women in Colorado are smokers [23]. In our cohort, 15% of women reported some smoking during pregnancy, which may indicate a degree of under-reporting consistent with the published literature. While about one-fourth of women quit smoking during pregnancy, the recidivism rate is high and women are most likely to continue smoking into the postnatal period [24-26]. Furthermore, as most individuals who smoke begin before the age of 18 years [27], the results reported here provide yet another clarion call to eliminate smoking initiation and remove this preventable risk factor for infant death and SIDS. Expectant mothers, women desiring pregnancy, and health care providers who care for them need to be reminded about this strong association of infant death with the preventable risk factor of maternal smoking. For example, physicians can counsel women desiring or planning pregnancy that if they smoke, the child will have a markedly increased risk of SIDS due to the smoking.

This study has several important limitations related to design and the nature of the data set used. Given the rich nature of the Colorado Birth Registry, we controlled for many potential confounding variables, but others may exist. This analysis likely represents an under-estimate of the actual associated risk with prenatal smoking, given that it relies on maternal report of a behavior widely known to be harmful. We suspect that self-report of maternal smoking underestimates the true rate of maternal smoking. Fetal and infant exposure to tobacco smoke occurs in manner ways, including prenatal maternal smoking, prenatal maternal second-hand smoke exposure, and postnatal smoke exposure by one or more care providers in the home. In this study we cannot distinguish among these exposure pathways, which may result in an erroneous under or over estimate of risk. The time period spanned by this study includes the rollout of the Back to Sleep campaign in the United States and our dataset did not assess whether parents positioned their infants prone or supine. We therefore could not control for this ecological association with SIDS. The very nature of retrospective data creates limitations in that we cannot carefully control the setting in which the data are collected, or the individual collecting the data. Missing data records are a third limitation, although this appears to have not been a major issue with this dataset.

Conclusions

As prone infant sleeping has decreased, other causes of SIDS such as maternal smoking assume increased importance in the effort to protect infants from SIDS. Spanning the rollout of the Back to Sleep campaign in the United States we examined the increasing attributed risk associating smoking with SIDS. As SIDS rates declined, the attributed risk of SIDS with smoking has increased. In the final year of analysis, we demonstrated a link between 80% of the SIDS deaths and maternal smoking. A major, preventable exposure remains for infants in the United States and providers should redouble counseling efforts toward reducing this exposure.

Competing interests

The author(s) declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors' contributions

MA participated in the study conception, background research, study design, statistical analysis, and drafting of the manuscript. DJ participated in the study conception, study design, and proofreading of the manuscript. HB participated in the study conception, study design, statistical analysis, and proofreading of the manuscript.

Acknowledgments

Initial results for this study were presented at a plenary session in the Ambulatory Pediatric Association's annual meeting in May 2003, held in Seattle, Washington. The authors would like to thank Dr. Ned Calonge, Acting Head of the State of Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment, who participated in the project design, and Dr. Allison Kempe, who provided critical review on the manuscript; project activities were made possible by The Faculty Development in Primary Care: 1 D 14 HP 00153-01; CFDA #93.895

References

  1. Anderson HR, Cook DG: Passive smoking and sudden infant death syndrome: review of the epidemiological evidence.

    Thorax 1997, 52:1003-1009. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  2. Schoendorf KC, Kiely JL: Relationship of Sudden Infant Death Syndrome to Maternal Smoking During and After Pregnancy.

    Pediatrics 1992, 90(6):905-908. PubMed Abstract OpenURL

  3. Wisborg K, Kesmodel U, Henriksen TB, Olsen F, Secher NJ: A prospective study of smoking during pregnancy and SIDS.

    Arch Dis Child 2000, 83:203-206. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  4. Kleinman JC, Pierre MB, Madans JH, Land GH, Schramm WF: The Effects of Maternal Smoking of Fetal and Infant Mortality.

    Am J Epidemiol 1988, 127(2):274-282. PubMed Abstract OpenURL

  5. Comstock GW, Shah FK, Meyer MB, Abbey H: Low birth weight and neonatal mortality rate related to maternal smoking and socioeconomic status.

    Am J Obstet Gynecol 1971, 111(1):53-59. PubMed Abstract OpenURL

  6. Malloy MH, Kleinman JC, Garland H, Schramm WF: The Association of Maternal Smoking with Age and Cause of Infant Death.

    Am J Epi 1988, 128(1):46-54. OpenURL

  7. Wilcox AJ: Birth Weight and Perinatal Mortality: The Effect of Maternal Smoking.

    Am J Epi 1993, 137(10):1098-1104. OpenURL

  8. Wisborg K, Kesmodel U, Henriksen TB, Olsen SF, Secher NJ: Exposure to Tobacco Smoke in Utero and the Risk of Stillbirth and Death in the First Year of Life.

    Am J Epi 2001, 154(4):322-327. Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  9. Leach CE, Blair PS, Fleming PJ, Smith IJ, Platt MW, Berry PJ, Golding J: Epidemiology of SIDS and Explained Sudden Infant Deaths.

    Pediatrics 1999, 104(4):e43. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  10. Klonoff-Cohen HS, Edelstein SL, Lefkowitz ES, Srinivasan IP, Kaegi D, Chang JC, Wiley KJ: The Effect of Passive Smoking and Tobacco Exposure through Breast Milk on Sudden Infant Death Syndrome.

    JAMA 1995, 273(10):795-798. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  11. Dwyer T, Ponsonby A-L, Blizzard L, Newman N, Cochrane JA: The Contribution of Changes in the Prevalence of Prone Sleeping Position to the Decline in Sudden Infant Death Syndrome in Tasmania.

    JAMA 1995, 273:783-789.

    March 8, 1995

    PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  12. Gordis L: Epidemiology. Second edition. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders Company; 2000.

  13. Pollack H, Lantz PM, Frohna JG: Maternal Smoking and Adverse Birth Outcomes Among Singletons and Twins.

    Am J Pub Health 2000, 90(3):390-400. OpenURL

  14. Crombie IK, Wright A, Irvine L, Clark RA, Slane PW: Does passive smoking increase the frequency of health service contacts in children with asthma.

    Thorax 2001, 56:9-12. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  15. Gilliland FD, Li Y-F, Peters JM: Effects of Maternal Smoking during Pregnancy and Environmental Tobacco Smoke on Asthma and Wheezing in Children.

    Am J Resp Crit Care 2000, 163:429-436. OpenURL

  16. Gergen PJ, Fowler JA, Maurer KR, Davis WW, Overpeck MD: The Burden of Environmental Tobacco Smoke Exposure on the Respiratory Health of Children 2 Months Through 5 Years of Age in the United States: Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1988 to 1994.

    Pediatrics 1998, 101(2):e8. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  17. Taylor JA, Sanderson M: A reexamination of the risk factors for the sudden infant death syndrome.

    J Pediatr 1995, 126(6):887-891. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  18. Mitchell EA, Ford RPK, Stewart AW, Taylor BJ, Becroft DMO, Thompson JMD, Scragg R, Hassall IB, Barry DMJ, Allen EM, Roberts AP: Smoking and the Sudden Infant Death Syndrome.

    Pediatrics 1993, 91(5):893-896. PubMed Abstract OpenURL

  19. Milerad J, Vege A, Opdal SH, Rognum TO: Objective measurements of nicotine exposure in victims of sudden infant death syndrome and in other unexpected child deaths.

    J Pediatr 1998, 133:232-236. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  20. DiFranza JR, Lew RA: Effect of Maternal Cigarette Smoking on Pregnancy Complications and Sudden Infant Death Syndrome.

    J Fam Pract 1995, 40(4):385-394. PubMed Abstract OpenURL

  21. Cnattingius S, Haglund B, Meirik O: Cigarette smoking as risk factor for late fetal and early neonatal death.

    BMJ 1988, 297:258-261. PubMed Abstract OpenURL

  22. Ford RPK, Tappin DM, Schluter PJ, Wild CJ: Smoking during pregnancy: how reliable are maternal self reports in New Zealand?

    J Epi Comm Health 1996, 51:246-251. OpenURL

  23. Porter S, Jackson K, Trosclair A, Pederson L: Prevalence of Current Cigarette Smoking among Adults and Changes in Prevalence of Current and Some Day Smoking – United States 1996–2001.

    MMWR 2003, 52(14):303-307. OpenURL

  24. Orleans CT, Barker DC, Kaufman NJ: Helping pregnant smokers quit: meeting the challenge in the next decade.

    West J Med 2001, 174:276-281. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  25. Lelong N, Kaminski M, Saurel-Cubiozolles M, Bouvier-Colle M: Postpartum return to smoking among usual smokers who quit during pregnancy.

    Eur J Pub Health 2001, 11(3):334-339. Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  26. Dwyer T, Ponsonby A-L, Couper D: Tobacco Smoke Exposure at One Month of Age and Subsequent Risk of SIDS – A Prospective Study.

    Am J Epi 1999, 149(7):593-602. OpenURL

  27. Breslau N, Peterson EL: Smoking cessation in young adults: age at initiation of cigarette smoking and other suspected influences.

    Am J Pub Health 1996, 86:214-219. PubMed Abstract OpenURL

Pre-publication history

The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:

http://www.biomedcentral.com/1741-7015/3/4/prepub