BMC Medicine

official impact factor 5.75

Open Access Research article

Vasectomy surgical techniques: a systematic review

Michel Labrecque1*, Caroline Dufresne1, Mark A Barone2 and Karine St-Hilaire1

Author Affiliations

1 Clinical and Evaluative Research Unit Saint-François D'Assise Hospital, Centre hospitalier universitaire de Québec (CHUQ), 10 rue de l'Espinay, D1-724, Quebec City (QC), Canada G1L 3L5

2 EngenderHealth, New York, NY 10001, USA

For all author emails, please log on.

BMC Medicine 2004, 2:21 doi:10.1186/1741-7015-2-21

Published: 24 May 2004

Additional files

Additional File 1:

Table 2. Criteria for study quality assessment.

Format: DOC Size: 34KB Download file

This file can be viewed with: Microsoft Word Viewer

Open Data

Additional File 2:

Evidence tables of studies comparing approaches to isolate the vas out of the scrotum. Table 3. Characteristics of studies comparing approaches to isolate the vas out of the scrotum. Table 4 Outcome measures of studies comparing approaches to isolate the vas out of the scrotum. Table 5. Quality assessment of studies comparing approaches to isolate the vas out of the scrotum. Table 6. Complication results of studies comparing approaches to isolate the vas out of the scrotum.

Format: DOC Size: 207KB Download file

This file can be viewed with: Microsoft Word Viewer

Open Data

Additional File 3:

Evidence tables of studies of vas ligation using metal clips. Table 7. Characteristics of studies of vas ligation using metal clips. Table 8. Outcome measures of studies of vas ligation using metal clips. Table 9. Quality assessment of studies of vas ligation using metal clips. Table 10. Results of studies of vas ligation using metal clips.

Format: DOC Size: 115KB Download file

This file can be viewed with: Microsoft Word Viewer

Open Data

Additional File 4:

Evidence tables of studies comparing vas occlusion techniques with and without folding back. Table 11. Characteristics of studies comparing vas occlusion techniques with and without folding back. Table 12. Outcome measures of studies comparing vas occlusion techniques with and without folding back. Table 13 Quality assessment of studies comparing vas occlusion techniques with and without folding back. Table 14. Results of studies comparing vas occlusion techniques with and without folding back.

Format: DOC Size: 110KB Download file

This file can be viewed with: Microsoft Word Viewer

Open Data

Additional File 5:

Evidence tables of studies comparing vas occlusion techniques with and without fascial interposition. Table 15. Characteristics of studies comparing vas occlusion techniques with and without fascial interposition. Table 16. Outcome measures of studies comparing vas occlusion techniques with and without fascial interposition. Table 17. Quality assessment of studies comparing vas occlusion techniques with and without fascial interposition. Table 18. Results of studies comparing vas occlusion techniques with and without fascial interposition.

Format: DOC Size: 111KB Download file

This file can be viewed with: Microsoft Word Viewer

Open Data

Additional File 6:

Evidence tables of studies of vas occlusion techniques using cautery. Table 19. Characteristics of studies of vas occlusion techniques using cautery. Table 20. Outcome measures of studies of vas occlusion techniques using cautery. Table 21. Quality assessment of studies of vas occlusion techniques using cautery. Table 22. Results of studies of vas occlusion techniques using cautery.

Format: DOC Size: 251KB Download file

This file can be viewed with: Microsoft Word Viewer

Open Data

Additional File 7:

Evidence tables of studies comparing vas occlusion techniques with and without leaving the testicular end open. Table 23. Characteristics of studies comparing vas occlusion techniques with and without leaving the testicular end open. Table 24. Outcome measures of studies comparing vas occlusion techniques with and without leaving the testicular end open. Table 25. Quality assessment of studies comparing vas occlusion techniques with and without leaving the testicular end open. Table 26. Results of studies comparing vas occlusion techniques with and without leaving the testicular end open.

Format: DOC Size: 150KB Download file

This file can be viewed with: Microsoft Word Viewer

Open Data

Additional File 8:

Evidence tables of studies combining isolation and occlusion of the vas. Table 27. Characteristics of studies combining isolation and occlusion of the vas. Table 28. Outcome measures of studies combining isolation and occlusion of the vas. Table 29. Quality assessment of studies combining isolation and occlusion of the vas. Table 30. Results of studies combining isolation and occlusion of the vas.

Format: DOC Size: 87KB Download file

This file can be viewed with: Microsoft Word Viewer

Open Data