Email updates

Keep up to date with the latest news and content from BMC Medicine and BioMed Central.

Journal App

google play app store
Open Access Highly Accessed Research article

Prediction of falls using a risk assessment tool in the acute care setting

Alexandra Papaioannou1*, William Parkinson2, Richard Cook3, Nicole Ferko45, Esther Coker6 and Jonathan D Adachi1

Author Affiliations

1 Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada

2 School of Rehabilitation Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada

3 Department of Statistics & Actuarial Sciences, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada

4 Department of Clinical Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada

5 Innovus Research Inc., Burlington, Ontario, Canada

6 Hamilton Health Sciences, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada

For all author emails, please log on.

BMC Medicine 2004, 2:1  doi:10.1186/1741-7015-2-1

Published: 21 January 2004

Abstract

Background

The British STRATIFY tool was previously developed to predict falls in hospital. Although the tool has several strengths, certain limitations exist which may not allow generalizability to a Canadian setting. Thus, we tested the STRATIFY tool with some modification and re-weighting of items in Canadian hospitals.

Methods

This was a prospective validation cohort study in four acute care medical units of two teaching hospitals in Hamilton, Ontario. In total, 620 patients over the age of 65 years admitted during a 6-month period. Five patient characteristics found to be risk factors for falls in the British STRATIFY study were tested for predictive validity. The characteristics included history of falls, mental impairment, visual impairment, toileting, and dependency in transfers and mobility. Multivariate logistic regression was used to obtain optimal weights for the construction of a risk score. A receiver-operating characteristic curve was generated to show sensitivities and specificities for predicting falls based on different threshold scores for considering patients at high risk.

Results

Inter-rater reliability for the weighted risk score indicated very good agreement (inter-class correlation coefficient = 0.78). History of falls, mental impairment, toileting difficulties, and dependency in transfer / mobility significantly predicted fallers. In the multivariate model, mental status was a significant predictor (P < 0.001) while history of falls and transfer / mobility difficulties approached significance (P = 0.089 and P = 0.077 respectively). The logistic regression model led to weights for a risk score on a 30-point scale. A risk score of 9 or more gave a sensitivity of 91% and specificity of 60% for predicting who would fall.

Conclusion

Good predictive validity for identifying fallers was achieved in a Canadian setting using a simple-to-obtain risk score that can easily be incorporated into practice.