Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
13 Apr 2012 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 2 | |
21 May 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Alice Holt |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
21 May 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 4 | |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 5 | |
1 Jun 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Walter Pories |
6 Aug 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - justin geoghegan |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 6 | |
Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 7 | |
Resubmission - Version 8 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 8 | |
28 Sep 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Alice Holt |
Resubmission - Version 9 | ||
28 Sep 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 9 |
Resubmission - Version 10 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 10 | |
23 Oct 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Alice Holt |
Resubmission - Version 11 | ||
23 Oct 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 11 |
23 Oct 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - justin geoghegan |
3 Dec 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Alice Holt |
Resubmission - Version 12 | ||
3 Dec 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 12 |
Publishing | ||
10 Jan 2013 | Editorially accepted | |
10 Jan 2013 | Article published | 10.1186/1741-7015-11-8 |
You can find further information about peer review here.