Table 1

New dataset of images and classification of the different comparisons
Sample Age (years) Muscle Morphological pattern evaluation ALL 82cc Control versus MD 82cc Control versus NA 82cc
cc = 15, 16, 25, 29, 30, 32, 34, 62, 69 cc = 13, 18, 15, 27, 41 cc = 21, 33, 55
X03-1 45 Biceps Normal C No D No N
X06-1 18 Biceps Normal C No D No N
X11-1 12 Quadriceps Normal C No D No N
X12-1 6 Quadriceps Normal C No D No N
X01-1 55 Biceps Dystrophic pattern D D No N
X01-2 55 Biceps Dystrophic pattern D D No N
X01-3 55 Biceps Dystrophic pattern D D No N
X01-4 55 Biceps Dystrophic pattern D D No N
X01-5 55 Biceps Dystrophic pattern D D No N
X13-1 3 months Quadriceps Dystrophic pattern D D N
X05-1 54 Gastrocnemius NA-severe-pseudodystrophy N D N
X02-1 37 Gastrocnemius NA, only focal grouping C No D No N
X02-2 37 Gastrocnemius NA, only focal grouping C No D No N
X04-1 47 Gastrocnemius NA, slight-moderate C No D N
X04-2 47 Gastrocnemius NA, slight-moderate C No D N

Results of the classification of the three comparisons performed on different test samples. In these comparisons 82 characteristics were used in the feature selection step. The table shows the selected characteristics in each case. Cases where NDICIA was not able to classify the condition correctly are labeled in bold. ‘No D’ corresponds to cases where NA was classified as ‘not dystrophic’, and ‘No N’ the cases with fibrosis was classified as being ‘not neurogenic’ since there were only two options in these double comparisons. C, normal pattern, D, dystrophic pattern, N, neurogenic pattern.

Sáez et al.

Sáez et al. BMC Medicine 2013 11:77   doi:10.1186/1741-7015-11-77

Open Data