Email updates

Keep up to date with the latest news and content from BMC Medicine and BioMed Central.

Journal App

google play app store
Open Access Highly Accessed Research article

Are behavioral interventions effective in increasing physical activity at 12 to 36 months in adults aged 55 to 70 years? a systematic review and meta-analysis

Nicola Hobbs*, Alan Godfrey, Jose Lara, Linda Errington, Thomas D Meyer, Lynn Rochester, Martin White, John C Mathers and Falko F Sniehotta

BMC Medicine 2013, 11:75  doi:10.1186/1741-7015-11-75

PubMed Commons is an experimental system of commenting on PubMed abstracts, introduced in October 2013. Comments are displayed on the abstract page, but during the initial closed pilot, only registered users can read or post comments. Any researcher who is listed as an author of an article indexed by PubMed is entitled to participate in the pilot. If you would like to participate and need an invitation, please email info@biomedcentral.com, giving the PubMed ID of an article on which you are an author. For more information, see the PubMed Commons FAQ.

Correction

Nicola O'Brien   (2013-05-21 10:09)  Newcastle University email

Since publishing this manuscript we have identified a typographical error in the sample size of one included trial (#32 - Lawton et al. 2008) reported in Figures 3 and 5 (self-reported physical activity duration at 12 months measured on a continuous scale). The sample size should read n=544 for the intervention group and n=545 for the control group, as is reported for this trial in Figure 4.

This error does not alter the overall findings of this meta-analysis (the magnitude of pooled effect size or heterogeneity) or the conclusions we draw.

The data reported in the text relating to the forest plot illustrated in Figure 3 should read:
��Figure 3: SMD = 0.19, 95% CI = 0.11 to 0.27; I2 = 41%, 95% CI = 0 to 74��.

The data reported in the text in the section entitled exploratory sub-group analysis, relating to the association between the intervention effect and the number of intervention contacts, should read:
��Based on a median split, intervention effect was negatively associated with intervention intensity such that interventions that had more intervention contacts (��11 contacts) did not have a detectable intervention effect on PA duration (SMD = 0.20, 95% CI = -0.08 to 0.47, I2 = 71%) while interventions that had less intervention contacts (��11 contacts) had a positive intervention effect (SMD = 0.17, 95% CI = 0.08 to 0.26, I2 = 41%). However, there was no statistically significant difference between subgroups (Chi2 = 0.04, P = 0.84)��.

Corrected Figures 3 and 5 are available on request.

Competing interests

None

top

Post a comment