Table 2 |
||
|
The 20 clinical journals that published the most systematic reviews in 2000 |
||
| Journal |
No. reviews (% of all original and review articles) |
No. systematic reviews (% of all reviews) |
|
|
||
| COCHRANE LIBRARY |
444 (100.0) |
427 (96.2) |
| LANCET |
61 (9.7) |
23 (37.7) |
| ARCH INTERN MED |
61 (17.4) |
21 (34.4) |
| BMJ |
154 (32.6) |
20 (13.0) |
| ANN INTERN MED |
34 (21.1) |
14 (41.2) |
| JAMA |
37 (8.3) |
14 (37.8) |
| J FAM PRACT |
24 (22.9) |
13 (54.2) |
| CHEST |
69 (13.5) |
12 (17.4) |
| OBSTET GYNECOL |
13 (3.8) |
8 (61.5) |
| SPINE |
23 (5.9) |
8 (34.8) |
| STROKE |
17 (4.3) |
7 (41.2) |
| NEUROLOGY |
54 (8.0) |
7 (13.0) |
| J CLIN ONCOL |
35 (7.9) |
7 (20.0) |
| CMAJ |
65 (43.9) |
6 (9.2) |
| J ADV NURS |
33 (12.5) |
6 (18.2) |
| SCHIZOPHR BULL |
9 (15.8) |
6 (66.7) |
| J RHEUMATOL |
19 (4.6) |
6 (31.6) |
| DIABETES CARE |
20 (5.8) |
5 (25.0) |
| J GEN INTERN MED |
9 (8.5) |
5 (55.6) |
| AM J MED |
50 (26.2) |
5 (10.0) |
|
|
||
|
Montori et al. BMC Medicine 2003 1:2 doi:10.1186/1741-7015-1-2 |
||
