Table 2

Statistics of visual pigment templates fit to spectral sensitivity curves

Gender

Fish ID

Visual pigment templatea

A2%b

1st R2c

2nd R2d

Subsete


SWS1

SWS2b

SWS2a

RH2b

RH2a

LWS


M. zebra

Female

ZF7

381 (0.62)

427 (0.63)

491 (0.76)

535 (0.90)

37.6

RH2a (0.98)

LWS (0.47)

1

ZF6

381 (0.46)

427 (0.82)

491 (0.70)

535 (0.90)

37.6

RH2a (0.98)

LWS (0.21)

1

ZF8

383 (0.88)

428 (0.55)

494 (0.73)

540 (0.87)

53.8

RH2a (0.94)

LWS (0.59)

1

ZF1

383 (0.09)

461 (0.96)

493 (0.72)

540 (0.85)

48.4

RH2a (0.95)

LWS (0.58)

2

ZF4

379 (0.91)

459 (0.30)

487 (0.69)

530 (0.94)

21.5

RH2a (0.93)

LWS (0.01)

2

ZF2

375 (0.53)

461 (0.98)

493 (0.38)

540 (0.96)

48.4

RH2a (0.95)

LWS (0.56)

2


Male

ZM2

375 (0.85)

457 (0.76)

484 (0.85)

526 (0.91)

8

RH2a (0.89)

LWS (0.49)

2

ZM6

378 (0.75)

458 (0.57)

487 (0.81)

530 (0.95)

18.8

RH2a (0.97)

LWS (-0.18)

2

ZM4

383 (0.15)

463 (0.64)

494 (0.54)

540(0.91)

53.7

RH2a (0.99)

LWS (0.62)

2

ZM1

385 (0.55)

463 (0.99)

495 (0.93)

544 (0.55)

59.1

RH2a (0.91)

LWS (0.64)

2

ZM3

378 (0.69)

458 (0.18)

487 (0.91)

530 (0.79)

18.8

RH2a (0.91)

LWS (-0.69)

2


M. auratus

Female

AF13

374 (0.84)

424 (0.70)

485 (0.82)

525 (0.72)

561 (0.87)

0

LWS (0.85)

3

AF15

374 (0.25)

424 (0.75)

485 (0.43)

525 (0.14)

561 (0.82)

0

LWS (0.85)

3

AF14

380 (0.76)

463 (0.33)

494 (0.81)

543 (0.71)

53.7

RH2a (0.91)

LWS (0.24)

4

AF11

429 (0.47)

497 (0.63)

547 (0.91)

64.5

RH2a (0.94)

LWS (0.84)

5


Male

AM14

374 (0.71)

424 (0.96)

485 (0.41)

525 (0.70)

561 (0.85)

0

LWS (0.96)

3

AM13

374 (0.67)

424 (0.60)

485 (0.73)

525 (0.74)

561 (0.85)

0

LWS (0.85)

3

AM12

374 (0.54)

457 (0.85)

485 (0.41)

525 (0.27)

561 (0.98)

0

LWS (0.98)

6

AM11

424 (0.32)

457 (0.09)

485 (0.85)

526 (0.43)

562 (0.57)

3

LWS (0.89)

7

AM16

424 (0.56)

485 (0.41)

525 (0.47)

561 (0.70)

0

LWS (0.84)

8

AM17

424 (0.97)

485 (0.70)

525 (0.29)

561 (0.88)

0

LWS (0.96)

8

AM18

457 (0.52)

485 (0.33)

525 (0.46)

561 (0.87)

0

LWS (0.87)

9


P. taeniolatus

Female

TF6

428 (0.49)

457 (0.89)

491 (0.75)

533 (0.55)

576 (0.95)

18.1

LWS (0.86)

7

TF2

428 (0.66)

457 (0.98)

487 (0.84)

528 (0.55)

571 (0.43)

10.6

LWS (0.63)

7

TF1

428 (0.49)

457 (0.97)

48 (0.49)

571 (0.91)

15.1

LWS (0.98)

RH2a (0.82)

10

TF4

428 (0.48)

457 (0.54)

529 (0.88)

571 (0.72)

10.6

LWS (0.91)

11

TF7

379 (0.81)

457 (0.47)

487 (0.63)

529 (0.54)

563 (0.73)

6

LWS (0.93)

6


Male

TM1

428 (0.68)

457 (0.64)

491 (0.59)

533 (0.52)

576 (0.88)

18.6

LWS (0.96)

7

TM3

428 (0.71)

457 (0.08)

494 (0.89)

529 (0.59)

571 (0.98)

15

LWS (0.95)

7

TM8

428 (0.59)

457 (0.94)

491 (0.90)

534 (0.49)

576 (0.80)

22.6

LWS (0.95)

7

TM4

428 (0.64)

457 (0.91)

486 (0.84)

563 (0.98)

3

LWS (0.98)

RH2a (0.96)

9

TM6

428 (0.42)

457 (0.45)

487 (0.74)

571 (0.94)

10.7

LWS (0.97)

RH2a (0.87)

9

TM5

379 (0.78)

457 (0.84)

486 (0.50)

529 (0.57)

563 (0.91)

3

LWS (0.97)

6

TM2

380 (0.95)

457 (0.99)

491 (0.67)

533 (0.87)

576 (0.99)

18.1

LWS (0.99)

6


aλmax (nm) of Visual pigment template that were fitted to the sensitivity curve (R2 values of the template fits in parentheses). Owing to cone interactions, the sensitivity peaks measured were typically narrower than the fitted pigment templates, resulting in relatively low R2 values.

bEstimated A2 percent in the retina (A2 percent = A2 proportion × 100).

cThe visual pigment template that resulted in the highest R2 value when fitted to the long-wavelength limb of the spectral sensitivity curve (R2 value of the template fit in parentheses).

dThe visual pigment template which resulted in the second highest R2 value when fitted to the long-wavelength limb of the spectral sensitivity curve (R2 value of the template fit in parentheses).

eThe cone pigment subset to which each individual was assigned.

Sabbah et al. BMC Biology 2010 8:133   doi:10.1186/1741-7007-8-133

Open Data