Table 2

LRT comparisons of trees with constrained clades versus fully unconstrained trees

Constrained branches

dN/dS

p-value

Degrees of freedom


atpE

All

0.256

0.040

20

Convolvulaceae

0.284

All but Convolvulaceae

0.193

0.049

19

Cuscuta

0.323

All but Cuscuta

0.168

0.120

19

Subgenus Grammica + subg. Cuscuta

0.323

All but subg. Grammica + subg. Cuscuta

0.168

0.000

19

Subgenus Grammica

0.238

All but subgenus Grammica

0.264

0.032

19

rbcL

All

0.071

0.001

20

Convolvulaceae

0.057

All but Convolvulaceae

0.111

0.006

19

Cuscuta

0.052

All but Cuscuta

0.111

0.011

19

Subgenus Grammica + subg. Cuscuta

0.047

All but subg. Grammica + subg. Cuscuta

0.108

0.047

19

Subgenus Grammica

0.094

All but subgenus Grammica

0.046

0.011

19

rps2

All

0.207

0.003

20

Convolvulaceae

0.265

All but Convolvulaceae

0.098

0.127

19

Cuscuta

0.249

All but Cuscuta

0.140

0.012

19

Subgenus Grammica + subg. Cuscuta

0.249

All but subg. Grammica + subg. Cuscuta

0.165

0.005

19

Subgenus Grammica

0.238

All but subgenus Grammica

0.192

0.002

19

rpoA

All

0.322

0.247

20

Convolvulaceae

0.357

All but Convolvulaceae

0.259

0.331

19

Cuscuta

0.360

All but Cuscuta

0.276

0.296

19

Subgenus Cuscuta

0.333

All but subg. Cuscuta

0.316

0.203

19

Cuscuta nitida

0.389

All but C. nitida

0.313

0.223

19


McNeal et al. BMC Biology 2007 5:55   doi:10.1186/1741-7007-5-55

Open Data