Email updates

Keep up to date with the latest news and content from BMC International Health and Human Rights and BioMed Central.

Open Access Research article

Models of care for orphaned and separated children and upholding children’s rights: cross-sectional evidence from western Kenya

Lonnie Embleton1, David Ayuku2, Allan Kamanda3, Lukoye Atwoli4, Samuel Ayaya5, Rachel Vreeman6, Winstone Nyandiko5, Peter Gisore5, Julius Koech7 and Paula Braitstein11089*

Author Affiliations

1 Department of Medicine, Moi University, College of Health Sciences, Eldoret, Kenya

2 College of Health Sciences, Department of Behavioral Sciences, Moi University, Eldoret, Kenya

3 Moi Teaching and Referral Hospital, Eldoret, Kenya

4 College of Health Sciences, Department of Mental Health, Moi University, Eldoret, Kenya

5 College of Health Sciences, Department of Child Health and Pediatrics, Moi University, Eldoret, Kenya

6 Department of Pediatrics, Indiana University, Indianapolis, USA

7 Academic Model Providing Access to Healthcare, Eldoret, Kenya

8 Department of Medicine, Indiana University, 1001 West 10th Street, OPW M200 Indianapolis, IN, USA

9 Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada

10 Regenstrief Institute Inc., Indianapolis, USA

For all author emails, please log on.

BMC International Health and Human Rights 2014, 14:9  doi:10.1186/1472-698X-14-9

Published: 1 April 2014

Abstract

Background

Sub-Saharan Africa is home to approximately 55 million orphaned children. The growing orphan crisis has overwhelmed many communities and has weakened the ability of extended families to meet traditional care-taking expectations. Other models of care and support have emerged in sub-Saharan Africa to address the growing orphan crisis, yet there is a lack of information on these models available in the literature. We applied a human rights framework using the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child to understand what extent children’s basic human rights were being upheld in institutional vs. community- or family-based care settings in Uasin Gishu County, Kenya.

Methods

The Orphaned and Separated Children’s Assessments Related to their Health and Well-Being Project is a 5-year cohort of orphaned children and adolescents aged ≤18 year. This descriptive analysis was restricted to baseline data. Chi-Square test was used to test for associations between categorical /dichotomous variables. Fisher’s exact test was also used if some cells had expected value of less than 5.

Results

Included in this analysis are data from 300 households, 19 Charitable Children’s Institutions (CCIs) and 7 community-based organizations. In total, 2871 children were enrolled and had baseline assessments done: 1390 in CCI’s and 1481 living in households in the community. We identified and described four broad models of care for orphaned and separated children, including: institutional care (sub-classified as ‘Pure CCI’ for those only providing residential care, ‘CCI-Plus’ for those providing both residential care and community-based supports to orphaned children , and ‘CCI-Shelter’ which are rescue, detention, or other short-term residential support), family-based care, community-based care and self-care. Children in institutional care (95%) were significantly (p < 0.0001) more likely to have their basic material needs met in comparison to those in family-based care (17%) and institutions were better able to provide an adequate standard of living.

Conclusions

Each model of care we identified has strengths and weaknesses. The orphan crisis in sub-Saharan Africa requires a diversity of care environments in order to meet the needs of children and uphold their rights. Family-based care plays an essential role; however, households require increased support to adequately care for children.

Keywords:
Orphans; Vulnerable children; Sub-saharan africa; Kenya; Street children; Children’s rights