Table 3 |
||
|
Prevalence differences for the relationship between water treatment method and diarrheal diseaseA in the North Atlantic Autonomous Region, Nicaragua, 2009. |
||
|
Final ModelB |
Full Multivariate ModelC |
|
|
PD (95% CI) |
PD (95% CI) |
|
|
|
||
|
Water Treatment |
||
|
None |
0 |
0 |
|
Chlorine |
-0.05 (-0.21, 0.11) |
-0.07 (-0.24, 0.09) |
|
Filter |
-0.12 (-0.33, 0.10) |
-0.13 (-0.36, 0.10) |
|
|
||
|
PD = prevalence difference A Two week prevalence of household diarrhea BThe final model was adjusted for water source only. CThe full multivariate model was adjusted for water source, tambos (as a proxy for location in a flood prone region), time to the health center, number of individuals in the household, and education level of the head of household (as a proxy for socioeconomic status) |
||
|
Denslow et al. BMC International Health and Human Rights 2010 10:30 doi:10.1186/1472-698X-10-30 |
||
