Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
26 Aug 2010 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
4 Sep 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - asma qureshi |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
4 Sep 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
18 Sep 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Babar Tasneem Shaikh |
20 Sep 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Jean-Pierre Unger |
1 Oct 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - asma qureshi |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
1 Oct 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
3 Oct 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - asma qureshi |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
3 Oct 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 5 | |
11 Oct 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - asma qureshi |
13 Oct 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Jean-Pierre Unger |
23 Oct 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Babar Tasneem Shaikh |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
11 Oct 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 7 | |
8 Nov 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - asma qureshi |
Resubmission - Version 8 | ||
8 Nov 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 8 |
Publishing | ||
9 Nov 2010 | Editorially accepted | |
9 Nov 2010 | Article published | 10.1186/1472-698X-10-26 |
You can find further information about peer review here.