Peer Review reports
From: A structured registration program can be validly used for quality assessment in general practice
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 27 May 2009 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 8 Jun 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Jesse Crosson |
| 20 Jun 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Erwin Klein Woolthuis |
| 16 Jul 2009 | Author responded | Author comments - Andrea Fokkens |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 16 Jul 2009 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 22 Jul 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Erwin Klein Woolthuis |
| 30 Jul 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Jesse Crosson |
| 30 Sep 2009 | Author responded | Author comments - Andrea Fokkens |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 30 Sep 2009 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| 2 Dec 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Jesse Crosson |
| 10 Dec 2009 | Author responded | Author comments - Andrea Fokkens |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 10 Dec 2009 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| Publishing | ||
| 21 Dec 2009 | Editorially accepted | |
| 21 Dec 2009 | Article published | 10.1186/1472-6963-9-241 |
You can find further information about peer review here.