Table 4 |
||||
|
Logistic regression analysis showing factors associated with referral to TSGs. |
||||
|
Characteristics |
Bivariate analysis ORa (95% CI) |
P-value |
Multivariate analysis ORb (95% CI) |
P-value |
|
|
||||
|
Gender: women |
0.5 (0.3 – 0.8) |
< 0.006 |
- |
- |
|
Older age |
1.0 (0.9 – 1.0) |
0.254 |
- |
- |
|
Longer experience in addiction field |
1.0 (0.9 – 1.0) |
0.220 |
- |
- |
|
Twelve step treatment unit present in the county |
3.8 (2.3 – 6.5) |
< 0.001 |
- |
- |
|
More positive attitude about TSGs |
1.7 (1.4 – 2.0) |
< 0.001 |
- |
- |
|
More openness to TSG at workplace |
1.3 (1.1 – 1.4) |
< 0.001 |
- |
- |
|
Higher self-efficacy for making successful referrals to TSGs |
1.5 (1.3 – 1.7) |
< 0.001 |
1.3 (1.1 – 1.5) |
< 0.001 |
|
Greater TSG knowledge |
1.3 (1.2 – 1.4) |
< 0.001 |
1.2 (1.1 – 1.3) |
0.005 |
|
Integration and use of the 12-steps in own treatment work |
8.4 (4.3 – 16.3) |
< 0.001 |
4.4 (2.1 – 9.6) |
< 0.001 |
|
Ever attended AA/NA meetings |
2.7 (1.6 – 4.5) |
< 0.001 |
- |
- |
|
Education: |
||||
|
- Lower education |
0.9 (0.4 – 2.0) |
0.762 |
- |
- |
|
- College university |
0.4 (0.2 – 0.8) |
0.011 |
- |
- |
|
- University |
reference |
|||
|
Type of unit: |
||||
|
- Out-patient |
0.8 (0.4 – 1.6) |
0.565 |
- |
- |
|
- Short-term treatment (detox) |
0.4 (0.3 – 0.8) |
0.007 |
- |
- |
|
- Long-term treatment |
reference |
|||
|
|
||||
|
Variables with p-value < 0.10 were included in the multivariate analysis (N = 279) a = unadjusted OR b = adjusted OR |
||||
|
Vederhus et al. BMC Health Services Research 2009 9:147 doi:10.1186/1472-6963-9-147 |
||||