Peer Review reports
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 29 Sep 2008 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 25 Nov 2008 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Ragnhild Halvorsen |
| 3 Feb 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Andrew Kemp |
| 19 Mar 2009 | Author responded | Author comments - Ruchi Gupta |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 19 Mar 2009 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 22 Apr 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Andrew Kemp |
| 21 May 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Ragnhild Halvorsen |
| 22 Jun 2009 | Author responded | Author comments - Ruchi Gupta |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 22 Jun 2009 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 4 | |
| 21 Jul 2009 | Author responded | Author comments - Ruchi Gupta |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| 21 Jul 2009 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
| Publishing | ||
| 7 Aug 2009 | Editorially accepted | |
| 7 Aug 2009 | Article published | 10.1186/1472-6963-9-142 |
You can find further information about peer review here.