|
Results, summary of the judgements made by the 17 evaluators of the overall quality in the 12 examples in the pilot study |
||||||
| Example |
High |
Moderate |
Low |
Very low |
Consensus |
Comments |
|
|
||||||
| 1 |
2/15 |
4/15 |
5/15 |
4/15 |
Moderate |
|
| 2 |
12/17 |
5/17 |
- |
- |
High |
|
| 3 |
1/17 |
6/17 |
5/17 |
5/17 |
Need more information before consensus |
|
| 4 |
4/17 |
13/17 |
- |
- |
High |
Based on the new rule |
| 5 |
12/16 |
4/16 |
- |
- |
High |
|
| 6 |
7/17 |
10/17 |
- |
- |
High |
Based on new rule |
| 7 |
- |
11/17 |
6/17 |
- |
Moderate |
|
| 8 |
- |
6/17 |
3/17 |
8/17 |
High |
Based on new rule |
| 9 |
2/16 |
3/16 |
5/16 |
6/16 |
High/Moderate depending if there are fatal flaws |
|
| 10 |
- |
1/17 |
4/17 |
12/17 |
Very low |
|
| 11 |
1/17 |
3/17 |
8/17 |
5/17 |
High |
Changed question |
| 12 |
11/13 |
2/13 |
- |
- |
High |
|
Atkins et al. BMC Health Services Research 2005 5:25 doi:10.1186/1472-6963-5-25 |
||||||