Table 2

Areas of FSV assessment of CHO by SDHT
No. Issues/areas Assessment score
1 Condition of CHPS compound: Three scale score: Good = 2; Fair = 1; and Poor = 0
• Basic facilities
• Organization of rooms & documents (observed)
2 Reporting & Documentation: Three scale score: Good = 2; Fair = 1; and Poor = 0
• Situation of reporting to SDHT
• Statistical report
• Logistic related documents (check tally cards, ledger book, requisition, motorcycle log sheet/book)
3 Program based activities: Three scale score: Good = 2; Fair = 1; and Poor = 0
• Health promotion
• Home visits
• Reproductive health (reproductive health, school health, vitamin A, adolescent health services)
• Immunization
• Child Welfare Clinic
• Morbidity (malaria, ARI, diarrhoea, others)
4 Family planning Three scale score: Good = 2; Fair = 1; and Poor = 0
5 Community based surveillance Three scale score: Good = 2; Fair = 1; and Poor = 0
6 HIV/AIDS consultation Three scale score: Good = 2; Fair = 1; and Poor = 0
7 Other activities: Three scale score: Good = 2; Fair = 1; and Poor = 0
• Action plan & calendar of activities
• Community registers
• Supervise & support community health workers (activities done by CHO for communities, activities done by community with CHO’s attendance, supportive activities by community, Community Health Action Plan (CHAP))
• Referrals
8 Equipment & supplies Three scale score: Good = 2; Fair = 1; and Poor = 0
• Essential equipment & its management
• Medical supplies & consumable goods
• Forms, books & register
Final score Group 1: Good: = ≥ 80%; Fair = ≥ 60%; and Poor: = ≤ 59%
Group 2: Excellent: = ≥ 90%; Good: = 89 - 80%;
Fair = ≥ 79 - 60%; and Poor: = ≤ 59%

Aikins et al.

Aikins et al. BMC Health Services Research 2013 13:358   doi:10.1186/1472-6963-13-358

Open Data