Email updates

Keep up to date with the latest news and content from BMC Health Services Research and BioMed Central.

Open Access Highly Accessed Research article

Social firms as a means of vocational recovery for people with mental illness: a UK survey

Eleanor Gilbert1, Steven Marwaha23*, Alyssa Milton4, Sonia Johnson4, Nicola Morant5, Nicholas Parsons6, Adrian Fisher7, Swaran Singh2 and Di Cunliffe8

Author affiliations

1 Caludon Centre, Coventry and Warwickshire Partnership Trust, Clifford Bridge Road, Coventry CV2 2TE, UK

2 Division of Mental Health and Wellbeing, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry CV47AL, UK

3 Early Intervention in Psychosis, Coventry and Warwickshire Partnership Trust, Swanswell Point, Stoney Stanton Road, Coventry, UK

4 Department of Mental Health Sciences, University College London, 67-73 Riding House St, London W1W 7EJ, UK

5 Department of Psychology, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge CB2 3EB, UK

6 Medical Statistician, Division of Health Sciences, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry CV47AL, UK

7 Suresearch Office, Muirhead tower, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B152TT, UK

8 Social Firms UK, Suite 2, Victoria House, 10 Brighton Road, Redhill RH1 6QZ, Surrey

For all author emails, please log on.

Citation and License

BMC Health Services Research 2013, 13:270  doi:10.1186/1472-6963-13-270

Published: 11 July 2013

Abstract

Background

Employment is associated with better quality of life and wellbeing in people with mental illness. Unemployment is associated with greater levels of psychological illness and is viewed as a core part of the social exclusion faced by people with mental illness. Social Firms offer paid employment to people with mental illness but are under-investigated in the UK. The aims of this phase of the Social Firms A Route to Recovery (SoFARR) project were to describe the availability and spread of Social Firms across the UK, to outline the range of opportunities Social Firms offer people with severe mental illness and to understand the extent to which they are employed within these firms.

Method

A UK national survey of Social Firms, other social enterprises and supported businesses was completed to understand the extent to which they provide paid employment for the mentally ill. A study-specific questionnaire was developed. It covered two broad areas asking employers about the nature of the Social Firm itself and about the employees with mental illness working there.

Results

We obtained returns from 76 Social Firms and social enterprises / supported businesses employing 692 people with mental illness. Forty per cent of Social Firms were in the south of England, 24% in the North and the Midlands, 18% in Scotland and 18% in Wales. Other social enterprises/supported businesses were similarly distributed. Trading activities were confined mainly to manufacturing, service industry, recycling, horticulture and catering. The number of employees with mental illness working in Social Firms and other social enterprises/supported businesses was small (median of 3 and 6.5 respectively). Over 50% employed people with schizophrenia or bipolar disorder, though the greatest proportion of employees with mental illness had depression or anxiety. Over two thirds of Social Firms liaised with mental health services and over a quarter received funding from the NHS or a mental health charity. Most workers with mental illness in Social Firms had been employed for over 2 years.

Conclusions

Social Firms have significant potential to be a viable addition to Individual Placement and Support (IPS), supporting recovery orientated services for people with the full range of mental disorders. They are currently an underdeveloped sector in the UK.

Keywords:
Employment; Recovery; Mental illness; Social firm; Social enterprise