Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
13 Apr 2012 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
7 Jun 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Elizabeth Sutherland |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
7 Jun 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
30 Aug 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Federica Secci |
25 Sep 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Esther Suter |
29 Dec 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Elizabeth Sutherland |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
29 Dec 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
7 Jan 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Esther Suter |
28 Jan 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Federica Secci |
13 Apr 2013 | Author responded | Author comments - Elizabeth Sutherland |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
13 Apr 2013 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
20 Apr 2013 | Author responded | Author comments - Elizabeth Sutherland |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
20 Apr 2013 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
Publishing | ||
24 Apr 2013 | Editorially accepted | |
6 May 2013 | Article published | 10.1186/1472-6963-13-168 |
You can find further information about peer review here.