Email updates

Keep up to date with the latest news and content from BMC Health Services Research and BioMed Central.

Open Access Highly Accessed Research article

An organisational analysis of the implementation of telecare and telehealth: the whole systems demonstrator

Jane Hendy1*, Theopisti Chrysanthaki2, James Barlow2, Martin Knapp3, Anne Rogers4, Caroline Sanders5, Peter Bower5, Robert Bowen5, Ray Fitzpatrick6, Martin Bardsley7 and Stanton Newman8

Author Affiliations

1 University of Surrey, Department of Health Care Management and Policy, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK

2 Imperial College Business School, London, UK

3 PSSRU, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK

4 University of SouthamptonHealth Sciences, Southampton, UK

5 Institute of Population Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK

6 University of Oxford, Public Health, Oxford, UK

7 The Nuffield Trust, London, UK

8 City University London, Health Services Research; UCL, Cardiovascular Sciences, London, UK

For all author emails, please log on.

BMC Health Services Research 2012, 12:403  doi:10.1186/1472-6963-12-403

Published: 15 November 2012

Abstract

Background

To investigate organisational factors influencing the implementation challenges of redesigning services for people with long term conditions in three locations in England, using remote care (telehealth and telecare).

Methods

Case-studies of three sites forming the UK Department of Health’s Whole Systems Demonstrator (WSD) Programme. Qualitative research techniques were used to obtain data from various sources, including semi-structured interviews, observation of meetings over the course programme and prior to its launch, and document review. Participants were managers and practitioners involved in the implementation of remote care services.

Results

The implementation of remote care was nested within a large pragmatic cluster randomised controlled trial (RCT), which formed a core element of the WSD programme. To produce robust benefits evidence, many aspect of the trial design could not be easily adapted to local circumstances. While remote care was successfully rolled-out, wider implementation lessons and levels of organisational learning across the sites were hindered by the requirements of the RCT.

Conclusions

The implementation of a complex innovation such as remote care requires it to organically evolve, be responsive and adaptable to the local health and social care system, driven by support from front-line staff and management. This need for evolution was not always aligned with the imperative to gather robust benefits evidence. This tension needs to be resolved if government ambitions for the evidence-based scaling-up of remote care are to be realised.

Keywords:
Telecare; Telehealth; Whole system redesign; Organisational change; Adoption; Implementation; Ethnographic methods