Table 3 |
||||||
|
Regressions with the proportion of Caesarean sections per hospital as the dependent variable. |
||||||
|
Variable |
Main analysis |
Imputation for missing values |
Test for whether the effect of hospital revenue per bed varies according to number of births |
|||
|
I |
II |
III |
||||
|
|
||||||
|
Intercept |
-1.262 |
** |
-1.207 |
** |
-3.210 |
** |
|
(2.38) |
(2.45) |
(3.12) |
||||
|
rev_hosp (lagged) |
0.137 |
** |
0.153 |
** |
0.462 |
** |
|
(2.38) |
(2.63) |
(2.88) |
||||
|
age_le201 |
-0.012 |
0.014 |
-0.016 |
|||
|
(0.36) |
(0.42) |
(0.48) |
||||
|
age_hi351 |
0.111 |
** |
0.123 |
** |
0.110 |
** |
|
(2.78) |
(3.12) |
(2.77) |
||||
|
edu_univ2 |
-0.064 |
0.015 |
-0.094 |
|||
|
(0.78) |
(0.20) |
(1.13) |
||||
|
edu_uss2 |
-0.372 |
** |
-0.361 |
** |
-0.424 |
*** |
|
(2.97) |
(2.88) |
(3.34) |
||||
|
weight_le25003 |
-0.013 |
-0.009 |
-0.002 |
|||
|
(0.53) |
(0.39) |
(0.11) |
||||
|
weight_hi45003 |
0.052 |
0.036 |
0.053 |
|||
|
(1.59) |
(1.12) |
(1.61) |
||||
|
ab_present |
0.316 |
**** |
0.316 |
**** |
0.300 |
**** |
|
(10.80) |
(10.81) |
(9.95) |
||||
|
preeclam |
0.126 |
**** |
0.122 |
**** |
0.130 |
**** |
|
(6.57) |
(6.34) |
(6.77) |
||||
|
mult_birth |
1.709 |
* |
1.715 |
* |
1.283 |
|
|
(1.89) |
(1.90) |
(1.39) |
||||
|
no_births |
-0.122 |
** |
-0.106 |
** |
0.153 |
|
|
(3.06) |
(2.65) |
(1.15) |
||||
|
weekend |
-0.345 |
*** |
-0.261 |
** |
-0.333 |
** |
|
(3.34) |
(2.92) |
(3.23) |
||||
|
rev_hosp (lagged) × no_births |
-0.046 |
** |
||||
|
(2.17) |
||||||
|
Number of observations |
1260 |
1334 |
1260 |
|||
|
Number of hospitals |
46 |
46 |
46 |
|||
|
R2 |
0.74 |
0.74 |
0.74 |
|||
|
|
||||||
|
All variables ln transformed. Regression coefficients with t-values in brackets. 1 Reference category: the proportion of mothers aged 20-35 years 2 Reference category: the proportion of mothers with compulsory school education 3 Reference category: the proportion of babies with a birthweight 2500-4500 g **** p < 0.0001 *** p < 0.001 ** p < 0.05 * p < 0.10 |
||||||
|
Grytten et al. BMC Health Services Research 2011 11:267 doi:10.1186/1472-6963-11-267 |
||||||