Peer Review reports
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 Apr 2010 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 1 Apr 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Michael Stokes |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 1 Apr 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 2 Jul 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Veerasathpurush Allareddy |
| 12 Aug 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Darryl Gray |
| 10 Oct 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Michael Stokes |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 10 Oct 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| 25 Oct 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Veerasathpurush Allareddy |
| 5 Nov 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Darryl Gray |
| 25 Feb 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Michael Stokes |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 25 Feb 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| 20 Apr 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Darryl Gray |
| 9 May 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Michael Stokes |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| 9 May 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
| Publishing | ||
| 31 May 2011 | Editorially accepted | |
| 31 May 2011 | Article published | 10.1186/1472-6963-11-135 |
You can find further information about peer review here.