Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
22 Sep 2009 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
30 Oct 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Maureen Porter |
13 Nov 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Lone Schmidt |
3 Dec 2009 | Author responded | Author comments - Florence Omu |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
3 Dec 2009 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
5 Dec 2009 | Author responded | Author comments - Florence Omu |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
5 Dec 2009 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
23 Dec 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Maureen Porter |
14 Feb 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Florence Omu |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
14 Feb 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
18 Feb 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Maureen Porter |
24 Feb 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Florence Omu |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
24 Feb 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
4 Mar 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Florence Omu |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
4 Mar 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
9 Mar 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Florence Omu |
Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
9 Mar 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 7 |
Resubmission - Version 8 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 8 | |
11 Mar 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Florence Omu |
Resubmission - Version 9 | ||
11 Mar 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 9 |
Publishing | ||
18 Mar 2010 | Editorially accepted | |
18 Mar 2010 | Article published | 10.1186/1472-6955-9-5 |
You can find further information about peer review here.