Table 1 |
||||
|
Details of study participants |
||||
|
ID |
Years as Practice Nurse |
Number of Practice Nurses (including respondent) in the practice |
Practice location* |
Practice list size (thousands) |
|
|
||||
|
1 |
12 |
3 |
IC |
12 |
|
2 |
6 |
2 |
IC |
6.5 |
|
3 |
20 |
1 |
S |
3.5 |
|
4 |
3 |
1 |
S |
3.2 |
|
5 |
1.5 |
3 |
R |
8.4 |
|
6 |
1 |
3 |
R |
9 |
|
7 |
12 |
1 |
R |
2.5 |
|
8 |
13 |
3 |
IC |
7.7 |
|
9 |
16 |
3 |
IC |
7.7 |
|
10 |
10 |
3 |
IC |
8.2 |
|
11 |
9 |
2 |
IC |
6 |
|
12 |
2 |
3 |
S |
9 |
|
13 |
3 |
4 |
S |
16 |
|
14 |
1 |
4 |
S |
16 |
|
15 |
2 |
1 |
R |
2.9 |
|
16 |
4 |
2 |
IC |
5.6 |
|
17 |
9 |
1 |
IC |
2.4 |
|
18 |
12 |
3 |
S |
8.6 |
|
19 |
7 |
4 |
IC |
12 |
|
20 |
4.5 |
2 |
S |
4.5 |
|
21 |
19 |
4 |
S |
6.7 |
|
22 |
3.5 |
4 |
S |
6.7 |
|
23 |
8 |
4 |
IC |
1.2 |
|
24 |
7.5 |
4 |
IC |
1.2 |
|
25 |
11 |
5 |
IC |
16 |
|
26 |
23 |
2 |
IC |
5.8 |
|
27 |
23 |
3 |
S |
6.7 |
|
28 |
21 |
5 |
IC |
8 |
|
|
||||
|
29 |
6 |
2 |
S |
6.7 |
|
|
||||
|
* IC = inner city; S = suburban; R = rural |
||||
|
Chew-Graham et al. BMC Nursing 2009 8:2 doi:10.1186/1472-6955-8-2 |
||||
