Table 1 |
||||||
|
Studies of handheld electronic medical records |
||||||
|
Study, Year |
Setting |
Patients |
Practitioners |
Primary Function |
Results |
Comments |
|
|
||||||
|
VanDenKerkof et al, 2004 [25] |
Canada |
Postoperative orthopedic patients (n = 72) |
Anesthesiologists, n = 4 |
Documentation of acute pain management service |
Encounter time 6.1 minutes in PDA group vs 4.6 minutes in paper chart (p = 0.00). Documentation significantly better for 3 of 5 main pain variables. |
|
|
Stengel et al, 2004 [26] |
Germany |
Orthopedic patients (n = 78) |
Registrar (n = 1), residents (n = 3), and medical students (n = 2) in orthopedics |
Documentation of daily progress, diagnoses |
More diagnoses entered using PDA vs paper (411 vs 157). |
More incorrect diagnoses using PDA vs paper (48 vs 7) |
|
|
||||||
|
Wu and Straus BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making 2006 6:26 doi:10.1186/1472-6947-6-26 |
||||||