Table 2 |
||
|
Individual and general knowledge |
||
|
General knowledge |
Individual knowledge |
|
|
|
||
|
Example |
Explicit general propositions, rules, algorithms, guidelines and formal theories for recognizing faces of people (e.g., a formal theory of human face recognition). |
The implicit knowledge used to recognize and the explicit knowledge (e.g., textual description) that would allow recognizing the face of a specific person. |
|
Complexity |
Very lean, abstract, symbolic. |
Varies from rich to lean. |
|
Acquisition |
Identical to acquisition of explicit knowledge. |
Identical to acquisition of both implicit and explicit knowledge. |
|
Representation Transferability |
Very structured, highly transferable, explicitly as general propositions, rules and guidelines. |
Varies from unstructured to less structured. Transferable in both implicit and explicit form. |
|
Context retention Applicability |
Does not retain context. Easy applicable to generic problems, difficult to apply to specific problem instances (e.g., recognition of the face of a specific person). |
Retains context. Well applicable to specific problem instances, especially if context retention is high. |
|
Processing mechanisms |
Logic reasoning. |
Pattern recognition, feature selection, associative recall, case-based reasoning. |
|
|
||
|
Pantazi et al. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making 2004 4:19 doi:10.1186/1472-6947-4-19 |
||