Email updates

Keep up to date with the latest news and content from BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making and BioMed Central.

Open Access Highly Accessed Research article

A simulation model of colorectal cancer surveillance and recurrence

Johnie Rose12*, Knut Magne Augestad3, Chung Yin Kong4, Neal J Meropol125, Michael W Kattan6, Qingqing Hong1, Xuebei An1 and Gregory S Cooper125

Author Affiliations

1 Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, 11000 Cedar Ave., Ste. 402, 44106-7136 Cleveland, OH, USA

2 Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Cleveland, OH, USA

3 Norwegian National Centre of Telemedicine and Integrated Care, University Hospital North Norway, Tromsø, Norway

4 Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA

5 Seidman Cancer Center, University Hospitals Case Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, USA

6 Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA

For all author emails, please log on.

BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making 2014, 14:29  doi:10.1186/1472-6947-14-29

Published: 8 April 2014

Abstract

Background

Approximately one-third of those treated curatively for colorectal cancer (CRC) will experience recurrence. No evidence-based consensus exists on how best to follow patients after initial treatment to detect asymptomatic recurrence. Here, a new approach for simulating surveillance and recurrence among CRC survivors is outlined, and development and calibration of a simple model applying this approach is described. The model’s ability to predict outcomes for a group of patients under a specified surveillance strategy is validated.

Methods

We developed an individual-based simulation model consisting of two interacting submodels: a continuous-time disease-progression submodel overlain by a discrete-time Markov submodel of surveillance and re-treatment. In the former, some patients develops recurrent disease which probabilistically progresses from detectability to unresectability, and which may produce early symptoms leading to detection independent of surveillance testing. In the latter submodel, patients undergo user-specified surveillance testing regimens. Parameters describing disease progression were preliminarily estimated through calibration to match five-year disease-free survival, overall survival at years 1–5, and proportion of recurring patients undergoing curative salvage surgery from one arm of a published randomized trial. The calibrated model was validated by examining its ability to predict these same outcomes for patients in a different arm of the same trial undergoing less aggressive surveillance.

Results

Calibrated parameter values were consistent with generally observed recurrence patterns. Sensitivity analysis suggested probability of curative salvage surgery was most influenced by sensitivity of carcinoembryonic antigen assay and of clinical interview/examination (i.e. scheduled provider visits). In validation, the model accurately predicted overall survival (59% predicted, 58% observed) and five-year disease-free survival (55% predicted, 53% observed), but was less accurate in predicting curative salvage surgery (10% predicted; 6% observed).

Conclusions

Initial validation suggests the feasibility of this approach to modeling alternative surveillance regimens among CRC survivors. Further calibration to individual-level patient data could yield a model useful for predicting outcomes of specific surveillance strategies for risk-based subgroups or for individuals. This approach could be applied toward developing novel, tailored strategies for further clinical study. It has the potential to produce insights which will promote more effective surveillance—leading to higher cure rates for recurrent CRC.

Keywords:
Colorectal cancer; Recurrence; Surveillance; Follow-up; Model