Table 4

Confirmatory factor analyses of the 3–factor prostate cancer screening anxiety model by clinic site
Model Chi–square (df) P–value CFI TLI RMSEA WRMR
Private Clinic
3-Content 178.932 (38) <.001 .921 .960 .112 1.369
3-Content + 6-Method 50.999 (36) .050 .992 .996 .038 .543
Public Clinic
3-Content 71.563 (31) <.001 .967 .985 .095 .884
3-Content + 6-Method 26.565 (29) .595 1.000 1.001 <.001 .420

Note. Content = hypothesized subscales; Method = similarly worded items; CFI = comparative fit index; TLI = Tucker–Lewis index; RMSEA = root mean square error of approximation; WRMR = weighted root mean square residual; bold font indicates adequate fit.

Linder et al.

Linder et al. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making 2012 12:52   doi:10.1186/1472-6947-12-52

Open Data