Peer Review reports
From: Determining correspondences between high-frequency MedDRA concepts and SNOMED: a case study
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 20 Nov 2009 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 2 | |
| 20 Nov 2009 | Author responded | Author comments - Prakash Nadkarni |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 20 Nov 2009 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| 1 Dec 2009 | Author responded | Author comments - Prakash Nadkarni |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 1 Dec 2009 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| 18 Jan 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Rachel Richesson |
| 6 Feb 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Olivier Bodenreider |
| 20 Feb 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Alan Rector |
| 28 Feb 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Prakash Nadkarni |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| 28 Feb 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
| 20 Apr 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Olivier Bodenreider |
| 10 Aug 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Prakash Nadkarni |
| Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
| 10 Aug 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
| 1 Sep 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Olivier Bodenreider |
| 7 Sep 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Prakash Nadkarni |
| Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
| 7 Sep 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 7 |
| 20 Sep 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Prakash Nadkarni |
| Resubmission - Version 8 | ||
| 20 Sep 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 8 |
| Resubmission - Version 9 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 9 | |
| 21 Sep 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Prakash Nadkarni |
| Resubmission - Version 10 | ||
| 21 Sep 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 10 |
| Publishing | ||
| 28 Oct 2010 | Editorially accepted | |
| 28 Oct 2010 | Article published | 10.1186/1472-6947-10-66 |
You can find further information about peer review here.