Peer Review reports
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 25 Sep 2012 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 29 Oct 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Michael Parker |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 29 Oct 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 28 Jan 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Paul Wenzel Geissler |
| 13 Feb 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Peter A Newman |
| 15 May 2013 | Author responded | Author comments - Michael Parker |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 15 May 2013 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| 11 Jul 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Peter A Newman |
| 30 Oct 2013 | Author responded | Author comments - Michael Parker |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 30 Oct 2013 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| 31 Oct 2013 | Author responded | Author comments - Michael Parker |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| 31 Oct 2013 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
| 24 Dec 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Peter A Newman |
| 29 Jan 2014 | Author responded | Author comments - Michael Parker |
| Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
| 29 Jan 2014 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
| Publishing | ||
| 31 Jan 2014 | Editorially accepted | |
| 17 Feb 2014 | Article published | 10.1186/1472-6939-15-12 |
You can find further information about peer review here.