Table 5 |
|||
|
Topics about which review committees asked for additional information (As described in the verdicts of the review committees) n = 75. |
|||
|
% |
(n) |
% |
|
|
|
|||
|
The patient's request1 |
11 |
(8) |
|
|
▪ Being well-considered |
8 |
||
|
▪ Voluntariness |
9 |
||
|
The patient's suffering1 |
32 |
(24) |
|
|
▪ Further specification of (unbearable) suffering |
23 |
||
|
▪ Course of disease |
12 |
||
|
▪ Patient was (sub) comatose |
4 |
||
|
▪ Other |
4 |
||
|
Informing the patient about their situation and prognosis |
- |
||
|
The presence of reasonable alternatives |
1 |
(1) |
|
|
The consultation1,2 |
41 |
(31) |
|
|
▪ Quality of consultant's report |
12 |
||
|
▪ Independency of consultant |
19 |
||
|
▪ Moment of consultation |
9 |
||
|
▪ Quality of consultation |
1 |
||
|
▪ Other |
4 |
||
|
Performance of euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide1 |
17 |
(13) |
|
|
▪ Type of medication |
13 |
||
|
▪ Physician's attendance |
3 |
||
|
▪ Other |
3 |
||
|
|
|||
|
Other topics1 |
21 |
(16) |
|
|
▪ Decision-making of the physician |
1 |
||
|
▪ Quality of physician's report |
13 |
||
|
▪ Other |
11 |
||
|
|
|||
|
1. More than one answer could be given. 2. In 70% of the cases, the reporting physician was also involved in the question for additional information from the review committees. |
|||
|
Buiting et al. BMC Medical Ethics 2009 10:18 doi:10.1186/1472-6939-10-18 |
|||