Table 2 |
||||||
|
Responses to survey (experiences with poster presentations) |
||||||
|
Questions |
Mean (SD) |
No. (%) strongly disagree |
No. (%) disagree |
No. (%) neither agree or disagree |
No. (%) agree |
No. (%) strongly agree |
|
|
||||||
|
My poster conveyed all the detail needed for viewers to understand the issues involved |
3.21 (1.11) |
2 (5.9) |
9 (26.5) |
6 (17.6) |
14 (41.2) |
3 (8.8) |
|
My poster attracted the attention of a range of other delegates |
3.44 (1.16) |
3 (8.8) |
4 (11.8) |
7 (20.6) |
15 (44.1) |
5 (14.7) |
|
My poster was an effective medium of knowledge transfer |
3.38 (1.05) |
2 (5.9) |
4 (11.8) |
11 (32.4) |
13 (38.2) |
4 (11.8) |
|
I found it easy to balance words & imagery within my Poster |
3.59 (0.99) |
0 (0) |
8 (23.5) |
2 (5.9) |
20 (58.8) |
4 (11.8) |
|
I think my poster provided a fair representation of my work |
3.68 (0.88) |
0 (0) |
5 (14.7) |
5 (14.7) |
20 (58.8) |
4 (11.8) |
|
My poster would have worked as a stand-alone presentation |
3.29 (1.29) |
3 (8.8) |
8 (23.5) |
6 (17.6) |
10 (29.4) |
7 (20.6) |
|
|
||||||
|
Items were scored on a 5-point scale, where 1 = strongly disagree, 3 = neither agree or disagree, 5 = strongly agree |
||||||
|
Rowe and Ilic BMC Medical Education 2009 9:71 doi:10.1186/1472-6920-9-71 |
||||||
