|
Participants' evaluation of Workshop Structure and content |
|||||||
| Item |
n |
Median Rating |
N (%) |
||||
|
|
|||||||
| Not at all satisfied 1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
Very satisfied 5 |
|||
|
|
|||||||
| Presentation by Ambassador |
81 |
4 |
0 |
0 |
11 (14%) |
37 (46%) |
33 (41%) |
| Interactive approach |
80 |
4 |
0 |
3 (4%) |
11 (14%) |
33 (41%) |
33 (41%) |
| Case study |
77 |
4 |
1 (1%) |
3 (4%) |
12 (16%) |
32 (42%) |
29 (38%) |
| One-page summaries |
81 |
5 |
0 |
1 (1%) |
5 (6%) |
25 (31%) |
50 (62%) |
| Action planning |
76 |
4 |
1 (1%) |
6 (8%) |
22 (29%) |
33 (43%) |
14 (18%) |
|
|
|||||||
| Strongly disagree 1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
Strongly agree 5 |
|||
|
|
|||||||
| The Ambassadors are a source of knowledge I respect |
79 |
4.5 |
0 |
0 |
6 (8%) |
34 (43%) |
39 (50%) |
| Workshop content was relevant for my organization/environment |
73 |
4 |
0 |
3 (4%) |
8 (10%) |
34 (43%) |
35 (44%) |
| Material was presented in language that held meaning for me |
81 |
4 |
0 |
0 |
7 (9%) |
41 (51%) |
33 (41%) |
| Content was relevant for my practice |
79 |
4 |
0 |
5 (6%) |
10 (13%) |
34 (43%) |
30 (38%) |
| Workshop met my information needs |
81 |
4 |
3 (4%) |
3 (4%) |
18 (22%) |
35 (43%) |
22 (27%) |
Rashiq et al. BMC Medical Education 2006 6:21 doi:10.1186/1472-6920-6-21 |
|||||||