Email updates

Keep up to date with the latest news and content from BMC Medical Education and BioMed Central.

Open Access Research article

Learning the facts in medical school is not enough: which factors predict successful application of procedural knowledge in a laboratory setting?

Ralf Schmidmaier1*, Stephan Eiber1, Rene Ebersbach1, Miriam Schiller1, Inga Hege2, Matthias Holzer2 and Martin R Fischer2

Author Affiliations

1 Klinikum der Universität München (LMU), Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik IV, Ziemssenstr. 1, 80336, Munich, Germany

2 Lehrstuhl für Didaktik und Ausbildungsforschung (DAM) in der Medizin am Klinikum der Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Munich, Germany

For all author emails, please log on.

BMC Medical Education 2013, 13:28  doi:10.1186/1472-6920-13-28

Published: 22 February 2013

Abstract

Background

Medical knowledge encompasses both conceptual (facts or “what” information) and procedural knowledge (“how” and “why” information). Conceptual knowledge is known to be an essential prerequisite for clinical problem solving. Primarily, medical students learn from textbooks and often struggle with the process of applying their conceptual knowledge to clinical problems. Recent studies address the question of how to foster the acquisition of procedural knowledge and its application in medical education. However, little is known about the factors which predict performance in procedural knowledge tasks. Which additional factors of the learner predict performance in procedural knowledge?

Methods

Domain specific conceptual knowledge (facts) in clinical nephrology was provided to 80 medical students (3rd to 5th year) using electronic flashcards in a laboratory setting. Learner characteristics were obtained by questionnaires. Procedural knowledge in clinical nephrology was assessed by key feature problems (KFP) and problem solving tasks (PST) reflecting strategic and conditional knowledge, respectively.

Results

Results in procedural knowledge tests (KFP and PST) correlated significantly with each other. In univariate analysis, performance in procedural knowledge (sum of KFP+PST) was significantly correlated with the results in (1) the conceptual knowledge test (CKT), (2) the intended future career as hospital based doctor, (3) the duration of clinical clerkships, and (4) the results in the written German National Medical Examination Part I on preclinical subjects (NME-I). After multiple regression analysis only clinical clerkship experience and NME-I performance remained independent influencing factors.

Conclusions

Performance in procedural knowledge tests seems independent from the degree of domain specific conceptual knowledge above a certain level. Procedural knowledge may be fostered by clinical experience. More attention should be paid to the interplay of individual clinical clerkship experiences and structured teaching of procedural knowledge and its assessment in medical education curricula.

Keywords:
Conceptual knowledge; Procedural knowledge; Strategic knowledge; Conditional knowledge; Key feature problems; Problem solving task; Clinical experience; Prior cognitive performance