Email updates

Keep up to date with the latest news and content from BMC Medical Education and BioMed Central.

Open Access Research article

Current practices in library/informatics instruction in academic libraries serving medical schools in the western United States: a three-phase action research study

Jonathan D Eldredge1, Karen M Heskett2*, Terry Henner3 and Josephine P Tan4

Author Affiliations

1 Health Sciences Library & Informatics Center and Department of Family & Community Medicine, University of New Mexico, MSC09 5100, Albuquerque, NM 87131-0001, USA

2 UC San Diego Biomedical Library, UC San Diego, 9500 Gilman Dr. 0699, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA

3 Savitt Medical Library, University of Nevada School of Medicine, Reno NV 89557, USA

4 UCSF Library and Center for Knowledge Management, UCSF, 530 Parnassus Avenue, San Francisco, CA 94143-0840, USA

For all author emails, please log on.

BMC Medical Education 2013, 13:119  doi:10.1186/1472-6920-13-119

Published: 4 September 2013

Abstract

Background

To conduct a systematic assessment of library and informatics training at accredited Western U.S. medical schools. To provide a structured description of core practices, detect trends through comparisons across institutions, and to identify innovative training approaches at the medical schools.

Methods

Action research study pursued through three phases. The first phase used inductive analysis on reported library and informatics skills training via publicly-facing websites at accredited medical schools and the academic health sciences libraries serving those medical schools. Phase Two consisted of a survey of the librarians who provide this training to undergraduate medical education students at the Western U.S. medical schools. The survey revealed gaps in forming a complete picture of current practices, thereby generating additional questions that were answered through the Phase Three in-depth interviews.

Results

Publicly-facing websites reviewed in Phase One offered uneven information about library and informatics training at Western U.S. medical schools. The Phase Two survey resulted in a 77% response rate. The survey produced a clearer picture of current practices of library and informatics training. The survey also determined the readiness of medical students to pass certain aspects of the United States Medical Licensure Exam. Most librarians interacted with medical school curricular leaders through either curricula committees or through individual contacts. Librarians averaged three (3) interventions for training within the four-year curricula with greatest emphasis upon the first and third years. Library/informatics training was integrated fully into the respective curricula in almost all cases. Most training involved active learning approaches, specifically within Problem-Based Learning or Evidence-Based Medicine contexts. The Phase Three interviews revealed that librarians are engaged with the medical schools' curricular leaders, they are respected for their knowledge and teaching skills, and that they need to continually adapt to changes in curricula.

Conclusions

This study offers a long overdue, systematic view of current practices of library/informatics training at Western U.S. medical schools. Medical educators, particularly curricular leaders, will find opportunities in this study's results for more productive collaborations with the librarians responsible for library and informatics training at their medical schools.

Keywords:
Medical libraries; Medical informatics; Teaching; Active learning; Curriculum; Library science; Information science; Information literacy; Information fluency; Information seeking behavior