Table 1 |
|
Drivers for uptake of simulated patient-based education |
|
• Raised profile of patient perspectives and patient empowerment |
|
• Ethical imperative of causing no harm to patients |
|
• Implementation of working time directives |
|
• Prominence of the patient safety movement |
|
• Increased numbers of medical and health professional students |
|
• Reduced hospital stays for patients |
|
• Growing evidence of simulation as an effective educational method |
|
• Growing evidence that effective health professional/patient communication is key to patient and clinician (learner) satisfaction and reduces litigation |
|
• Development of national assessments |
|
• Facilitates a systematic approach to curriculum activities |
|
• Development of 'professional' competencies |
|
• Carefully constructed simulations |
|
○ Assure students have direct/indirect exposure |
|
○ Allow for adjustment in the level of challenge |
|
○ Identify boundaries of competence |
|
○ Provide access to technical, communication and other professional skills essential for safe clinical practice |
|
○ Enable rehearsal of infrequently occurring events |
|
○ Assure the development of reflective practice (video, debriefing) |
|
|
|
Nestel et al. BMC Medical Education 2011 11:69 doi:10.1186/1472-6920-11-69 |