Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
17 Apr 2012 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
25 Jun 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Satish Viswanath |
28 Jul 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Daniel PIrici |
30 Jul 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Fabio Grizzi |
14 Sep 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Pedro Arruda |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
14 Sep 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
11 Oct 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Fabio Grizzi |
17 Oct 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Pedro Arruda |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
17 Oct 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
20 Oct 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Daniel PIrici |
1 Nov 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Satish Viswanath |
3 Dec 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Pedro Arruda |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
3 Dec 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
14 Dec 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Daniel PIrici |
2 Jan 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Satish Viswanath |
27 Jan 2013 | Author responded | Author comments - Pedro Arruda |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
27 Jan 2013 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
Publishing | ||
11 Feb 2013 | Editorially accepted | |
18 Feb 2013 | Article published | 10.1186/1472-6890-13-6 |
You can find further information about peer review here.