Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
25 Nov 2010 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
1 Jan 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Vilai Kuptniratsaikul |
20 Jan 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Edzard Ernst |
1 Feb 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Allen Sawitzke |
10 Mar 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Eytan Debbi |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
10 Mar 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
26 Mar 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Allen Sawitzke |
30 Mar 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Vilai Kuptniratsaikul |
20 May 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Eytan Debbi |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
20 May 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
2 Jun 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Eytan Debbi |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
2 Jun 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
14 Jun 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Eytan Debbi |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
14 Jun 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 6 | |
20 Jun 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Eytan Debbi |
Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
20 Jun 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 7 |
26 Jun 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Eytan Debbi |
Resubmission - Version 8 | ||
26 Jun 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 8 |
Publishing | ||
27 Jun 2011 | Editorially accepted | |
27 Jun 2011 | Article published | 10.1186/1472-6882-11-50 |
You can find further information about peer review here.