Log on / register
Feedback | Support | My details
Open AccessHighly AccessResearch article

Satisfaction and quality of life in women who undergo breast surgery: A qualitative study

Anne F Klassen1 email, Andrea L Pusic2 email, Amie Scott2 email, Jennifer Klok3 email and Stefan J Cano4 email

Department of Pediatrics, McMaster University, 3A 1200 Main Street W, Hamilton, ON, L8N 3Z5, Canada

Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY, 10065, USA

University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada

Neurological Outcomes Measures Unit, Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, Queen Square, London, WC1N 3BG, England, UK

author email corresponding author email

BMC Women's Health 2009, 9:11doi:10.1186/1472-6874-9-11

Published: 1 May 2009

Abstract

Background

In cosmetic and reconstructive breast surgery, measurement of patient-reported outcomes has become increasingly important to research efforts and clinical care. We aimed to describe how breast conditions and breast surgery impact on patient satisfaction and quality of life.

Methods

We conducted qualitative, in-depth interviews with 48 women who had undergone either breast reduction (n = 15), breast augmentation (n = 12), or breast reconstruction (n = 21) surgery in order to begin to build a theoretical understanding of patient satisfaction and quality of life in breast surgery patients. Interviews were audio-taped, transcribed verbatim and analyzed thematically.

Results

The patient interviews revealed that breast conditions and breast surgery impact women in the following six main areas: satisfaction with breasts; satisfaction with overall outcome; psychosocial well-being; sexual well-being; physical well-being; and satisfaction with the process of care. We used these six themes to form the basis of a conceptual framework of patient satisfaction and quality of life in women who undergo breast surgery.

Conclusion

Our conceptual framework establishes the main issues of concern for breast surgery patients. This new framework can be used to help develop local guidelines for future clinical assessment, management and measurement, establish the validity of the current management strategies, and develop evidence-based guidance for the development of new patient reported outcome measures for future outcomes research.


© 1999-2009 BioMed Central Ltd unless otherwise stated. Part of Springer Science+Business Media.