|
The proportion of preterm deliveries in the reference population1 in Sweden (S), Denmark (D) and Norway (N), 1995–2004, presented according to gestational age groups. |
||||||||||||
| Gestational weeks |
Country |
1995 |
1996 |
1997 |
1998 |
1999 |
2000 |
2001 |
2002 |
2003 |
2004 |
p-value for trend2 |
|
|
||||||||||||
| 22–27 |
S |
0.18 |
0.22 |
0.22 |
0.22 |
0.27 |
0.15 |
0.19 |
0.20 |
0.25 |
0.26 |
0.13 |
| D |
0.19 |
0.22 |
0.23 |
0.19 |
0.20 |
0.19 |
0.22 |
0.13 |
0.27 |
0.21 |
0.83 |
|
| N |
0.18 |
0.20 |
0.21 |
0.20 |
0.15 |
0.27 |
0.18 |
0.20 |
0.19 |
0.14 |
0.65 |
|
| p for homogeneity of trends: 0.37 |
||||||||||||
| 28–31 |
S |
0.55 |
0.69 |
0.56 |
0.60 |
0.64 |
0.54 |
0.62 |
0.62 |
0.59 |
0.57 |
0.80 |
| D |
0.66 |
0.67 |
0.62 |
0.67 |
0.65 |
0.57 |
0.61 |
0.63 |
0.59 |
0.66 |
0.48 |
|
| N |
0.53 |
0.43 |
0.40 |
0.61 |
0.38 |
0.34 |
0.35 |
0.45 |
0.35 |
0.26 |
< 0.001(R)3 |
|
| p for homogeneity of trends: 0.0034 |
||||||||||||
| 32–36 |
S |
5.5 |
5.3 |
5.1 |
5.2 |
5.4 |
5.5 |
5.0 |
5.3 |
5.2 |
5.6 |
0.82 |
| D |
4.5 |
5.0 |
4.3 |
4.8 |
5.0 |
5.0 |
5.2 |
5.4 |
5.6 |
5.4 |
< 0.001(I)4 |
|
| N |
4.7 |
4.5 |
4.6 |
5.1 |
4.3 |
4.4 |
4.6 |
4.7 |
4.4 |
4.4 |
0.18 |
|
| p for homogeneity of trends: < 0.001 |
||||||||||||
| < 37 |
S |
6.3 |
6.2 |
5.9 |
6.0 |
6.3 |
6.2 |
5.9 |
6.1 |
6.1 |
6.5 |
0.67 |
| D |
5.3 |
5.9 |
5.2 |
5.6 |
5.9 |
5.7 |
6.0 |
6.2 |
6.5 |
6.3 |
< 0.001(I) |
|
| N |
5.4 |
5.1 |
5.2 |
5.9 |
4.8 |
5.0 |
5.2 |
5.3 |
5.0 |
4.8 |
0.018 (R) |
|
| p for homogeneity of trends: < 0.001 |
||||||||||||
|
1 Reference population: 20 – 35-years-old primiparas, born in the country in which delivery occurs, with singleton, spontaneously conceived pregnancies. 2 p-values obtained from simple logistic regression analyses with the dichotomized variables specified as outcome variables, and year of birth as the only independent variable. 3(R) = Reduction 4(I) = Increase | ||||||||||||
Morken et al. BMC Women's Health 2008 8:16 doi:10.1186/1472-6874-8-16 |
||||||||||||