Table 1 |
|
Grading criteria for review of carer intervention studies |
|
Grade I (Strong evidence) |
|
RCTs or review of RCTS |
|
IA Calculation of sample size and accurate standard definition of appropriate outcome variables |
|
IB Accurate and standard definition of appropriate outcome variables |
|
IC Neither of the above |
|
Grade II (Fairly strong evidence) |
|
Prospective study with a comparison group (non-randomised controlled trial, good observational study or retrospective study that controls effectively for confounding variables). |
|
IIA Calculation of sample size and accurate, standard definition of appropriate outcome variables and adjustment for the effects of important confounding variables |
|
IIB One or more of the above |
|
Grade III (Weaker evidence) |
|
Retrospective or observational studies |
|
IIIA Comparison group, calculation of sample size, accurate and standard definition of appropriate outcome variables |
|
IIIB Two or more of the above |
|
IIIC None of these |
|
Grade IV (Weak evidence) |
|
Cross-sectional study, Delphi exercise, consensus of experts |
|
|
|
Hudson et al. BMC Palliative Care 2010 9:17 doi:10.1186/1472-684X-9-17 |