Email updates

Keep up to date with the latest news and content from BMC Oral Health and BioMed Central.

Open Access Highly Accessed Research article

Adhesion of Streptococcus mitis and Actinomyces oris in co-culture to machined and anodized titanium surfaces as affected by atmosphere and pH

Josefin Seth Caous13*, Maria Lövenklev2, Jenny Fäldt3 and Maud Langton24

Author Affiliations

1 Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering, Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg, SE-402 29, Sweden

2 SIK, The Swedish Institute for Food and Biotechnology, P.O. Box 5401, Gothenburg, SE-402 29, Sweden

3 Nobel Biocare AB, P.O. Box 5190, Gothenburg, SE-402 26, Sweden

4 Department of Food Science, SLU- Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, PO Box 7051, Uppsala, SE-756 45, Sweden

For all author emails, please log on.

BMC Oral Health 2013, 13:4  doi:10.1186/1472-6831-13-4

Published: 8 January 2013

Abstract

Background

With the rising demand for osseointegrated titanium implants for replacing missing teeth, often in patients with a history of periodontitis, implant-related infections have become an issue of growing concern. Novel methods for treating and preventing implant-associated infections are urgently needed. The aim of this study was to investigate if different pH, atmosphere and surface properties could restrict bacterial adhesion to titanium surfaces used in dental implants.

Methods

Titanium discs with machined or anodized (TiUnite™) surface were incubated with a co-culture of Streptococcus mitis and Actinomyces oris (early colonizers of oral surfaces) at pH 5.0, 7.0 and 9.0 at aerobic or anaerobic atmosphere. The adhesion was analysed by counting colony forming (CFU) units on agar and by confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM).

Results

The CFU analysis showed that a pH of 5.0 was found to significantly decrease the adhesion of S. mitis, and an aerobic atmosphere, the adhesion of A. oris. S. mitis was found in significantly less amounts on the anodized surface than the machined surface, while A. oris was found in equal amounts on both surfaces. The CLSM analysis confirmed the results from the CFU count and provided additional information on how the two oral commensal species adhered to the surfaces: mainly in dispersed clusters oriented with the groves of the machined surface and the pores of the anodized surface.

Conclusions

Bacterial adhesion by S. mitis and A. oris can be restricted by acidic pH and aerobic atmosphere. The anodized surface reduced the adhesion of S. mitis compared to the machined surface; while A. oris adhered equally well to the pores of the anodized surface and to the grooves of the machined surface. It is difficult to transfer these results directly into a clinical situation. However, it is worth further investigating these findings from an in vitro perspective, as well as clinically, to gain more knowledge of the effects acid pH and aerobic atmosphere have on initial bacterial adhesion.

Keywords:
Bacterial adhesion; Dental implants; Peri-implant disease; Confocal laser scanning microscopy