Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
11 Jun 2012 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
18 Jun 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Lonim Prasai Dixit |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
18 Jun 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
7 Sep 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Lonim Prasai Dixit |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
7 Sep 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
28 Sep 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Lonim Prasai Dixit |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
28 Sep 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
18 Oct 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Morenike Folayan |
28 Nov 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Saul Paiva |
24 Jan 2013 | Author responded | Author comments - Lonim Prasai Dixit |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
24 Jan 2013 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
24 Jan 2013 | Author responded | Author comments - Lonim Prasai Dixit |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
24 Jan 2013 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
5 Feb 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Morenike Folayan |
19 Feb 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Saul Paiva |
20 Apr 2013 | Author responded | Author comments - Lonim Prasai Dixit |
Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
20 Apr 2013 | Submitted | Manuscript version 7 |
23 Apr 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Morenike Folayan |
8 May 2013 | Author responded | Author comments - Lonim Prasai Dixit |
Resubmission - Version 8 | ||
8 May 2013 | Submitted | Manuscript version 8 |
Publishing | ||
10 May 2013 | Editorially accepted | |
14 May 2013 | Article published | 10.1186/1472-6831-13-20 |
You can find further information about peer review here.