Table 2

Reported performance for different implementations of published methods.

α

β

T

U


METHOD

Ref-set

Eval-set

WRange

RMSD

r

RMSD

r

RMSD

r

RMSD

r


CDSSTR

43

29

190–240

0.064

0.929

0.081

0.704

0.067

0.462

0.089

0.444

CONTIN-PG

18

18

190–240

0.05

0.96

0.06

0.94

0.1

0.31

0.11

0.49

CONTIN-LL

43

29

190–240

0.053

0.942

0.084

0.674

0.076

0.373

0.096

0.262

HJ

16

16

190–260

-

0.98

-

-0.27

-

0.18

-

0.24

SELCON3

43

29

190–240

0.051

0.953

0.086

0.659

0.073

0.382

0.11

0.181

SOMCD

45

39

190–240

0.07

0.95

0.08

0.92

0.04

0.75

0.06

0.94

VARSEL

16

16

190–260

-

0.95

-

0.45

-

0.54

-

0.69


Labels as in table 1, T: beta turns, U: unordered. CDSSTR, CONTIN-LL, and SELCON3 performance values are taken from [11], CONTIN-PG values from [5], HJ values from [4], SOMCD values from [12], and VARSEL values from [13]

Perez-Iratxeta and Andrade-Navarro BMC Structural Biology 2008 8:25   doi:10.1186/1472-6807-8-25

Open Data